Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31077168›Full record

Trial reportBMC musculoskeletal disorders2019

Telephone cognitive behavioural therapy to prevent the development of chronic widespread pain: a qualitative study of patient perspectives and treatment acceptability.

Claire Fraser, Marcus Beasley, Gary Macfarlane, Karina Lovell

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02668003 (The MAintaining MusculOskeleTal Health), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02668003 nacompletednot on this map

The MAintaining MusculOskeleTal Health (MAmMOTH) Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AberdeenRan2016 to 2019Enrolled1,002ConditionsWidespread Chronic PainArmsCognitive Behavioural Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Claire FraserSchool of Health Sciences, Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. claire.fraser@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3684-3168
Marcus BeasleyMedical Sciences and Nutrition, Health Sciences Building (1st floor), School of Medicine, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, Scotland.
Gary MacfarlaneMedical Sciences and Nutrition, Health Sciences Building (1st floor), School of Medicine, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, Scotland.
Karina LovellSchool of Health Sciences, Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
University of Aberdeen · GBGreater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

Arthritis Research UK 20748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTelephone cognitive behavioural therapy (tCBT) is an acceptable and effective treatment for patients with chronic widespread pain (CWP). Preventing the onset of CWP offers considerable benefits to the individual and society and the MAmMOTH study is the first aimed at CWP prevention. The study is a two-arm randomised trial testing a course of tCBT against usual care for prevention of CWP. This nested qualitative study explores patients' treatment experiences, with a view to understanding their potential influences on acceptability of the intervention.

methodsThe MAmMOTH Study recruited 1002 participants, half of whom were randomised to receive tCBT. Participants were eligible for invitation to the trial if they had pain for which they had consulted their GP, or had pain and visited a doctor frequently, and had 2 of 3 risk factors for development of CWP. Participants randomised to tCBT who had completed treatment were eligible for invitation to qualitative interviews for this study. Individual qualitative interviews were conducted with a sub-sample (n = 33) of patients at high risk of developing CWP who had been allocated to the intervention arm. Semi-structured telephone interviews explored treatment experiences and intervention acceptability. Data was analysed using Framework analysis.

resultsParticipants presented with a range of musculoskeletal and auto-immune conditions and almost half described their pain as 'chronic' on study entry. Many participants perceived the trial intervention to be aimed at treatment of pain rather than prevention of pain. Initial expectations prior to treatment varied, with scepticism more likely for those who had little prior knowledge of CBT approaches. All participants provided positive feedback post intervention particularly in relation to the modality, therapist experience and skills and the intervention. The majority of participants described positive changes in either their subjective level of pain or pain-management post-intervention and some attributed the positive change directly to the intervention as a result of empowerment, increased self-management and cognitive restructuring.

conclusionsThis study extends our understanding of the acceptability and suitability of preventative interventions for chronic widespread pain and provides further evidence for the acceptability of tCBT.

trial registrationClinical Trials.gov NCT02668003 (registered 29th January, 2016).

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overChronic PainCognitive Behavioral TherapyCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain ManagementPatient Acceptance of Health CareQualitative ResearchQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesTelemedicineChronic widespread painPatient perspectivesPreventionQualitativeTelephone cognitive behavioural therapyTreatment acceptability

Identifiers

PMID31077168
PMCPMC6511117
OpenAlexW2946434735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.