Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31077153›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2019

aFold - using polynomial uncertainty modelling for differential gene expression estimation from RNA sequencing data.

Wentao Yang, Philip Rosenstiel, Hinrich Schulenburg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wentao YangEvolutionary Ecology and Genetics, Zoological Institute, CAU Kiel, Am Botanischen Garten 9, 24118, Kiel, Germany. wyang@zoologie.uni-kiel.de.
Philip RosenstielInstitute for Clinical Molecular Biology, CAU Kiel, Am Botanischen Garten 11, 24118, Kiel, Germany.
Hinrich SchulenburgEvolutionary Ecology and Genetics, Zoological Institute, CAU Kiel, Am Botanischen Garten 9, 24118, Kiel, Germany. hschulenburg@zoologie.uni-kiel.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1413-913X

Funding

BMBF DEEP TP 2.3Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SCHU 1415/15Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DE) A1 project, CRC 1182EU H2020 SYSCIDMax-Planck Gesellschaft Fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundData normalization and identification of significant differential expression represent crucial steps in RNA-Seq analysis. Many available tools rely on assumptions that are often not met by real data, including the common assumption of symmetrical distribution of up- and down-regulated genes, the presence of only few differentially expressed genes and/or few outliers. Moreover, the cut-off for selecting significantly differentially expressed genes for further downstream analysis often depend on arbitrary choices.

resultsWe here introduce a new tool for estimating differential expression in noisy real-life data. It employs a novel normalization procedure (qtotal), which takes account of the overall distribution of read counts for data standardization enhancing reliable identification of differential gene expression, especially in case of asymmetrical distributions of up- and downregulated genes. The tool then introduces a polynomial algorithm (aFold) to model the uncertainty of read counts across treatments and genes. We extensively benchmark aFold on a variety of simulated and validated real-life data sets (e.g. ABRF, SEQC and MAQC-II) and show a higher ability to correctly identify differentially expressed genes under most tested conditions. aFold infers fold change values that are comparable across experiments, thereby facilitating data clustering, visualization, and other downstream applications.

conclusionsWe here present a new transcriptomics analysis tool that includes both a data normalization method and a differential expression analysis approach. The new tool is shown to enhance reliable identification of significant differential expression across distinct data distributions. It outcompetes alternative procedures in case of asymmetrical distributions of up- versus down-regulated genes and also the presence of outliers, all common to real data sets.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalSoftwareUncertaintyBrainGene Expression ProfilingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansSequence Analysis, RNAABSSeqbaySeqDESeq2Differential expression analysisedgeRNormalizationRNASeqTranscriptomicsVoom

Identifiers

PMID31077153
PMCPMC6509820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.