Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31077144›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2019

Weighting sequence variants based on their annotation increases the power of genome-wide association studies in dairy cattle.

Zexi Cai, Bernt Guldbrandtsen, Mogens Sandø Lund, Goutam Sahana

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zexi CaiDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, 8830, Tjele, Denmark. zexi.cai@mbg.au.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9579-3415
Bernt GuldbrandtsenDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, 8830, Tjele, Denmark.
Mogens Sandø LundDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, 8830, Tjele, Denmark.
Goutam SahanaDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, 8830, Tjele, Denmark.
Aarhus University · DK

Funding

Innovationsfonden 0603-00519B
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenome-wide association studies (GWAS) are widely used to identify regions of the genome that harbor genetic determinants of quantitative traits. However, the multiple-testing burden from scanning tens of millions of whole-genome sequence variants reduces the power to identify associated variants, especially if sample size is limited. In addition, factors such as inaccuracy of imputation, complex linkage disequilibrium structures, and multiple closely-located causal variants may result in an identified causative mutation not being the most significant single nucleotide polymorphism in a particular genomic region. Therefore, the use of information from different sources, particularly variant annotations, was proposed to enhance the fine-mapping of causal variants. Here, we tested whether applying significance thresholds based on variant annotation categories increases the power of GWAS compared with a flat Bonferroni multiple-testing correction.

resultsWhole-genome sequence variants in dairy cattle were categorized according to type and predicted impact. Then, GWAS between markers and 17 quantitative traits were analyzed for enrichment for association of each annotation category. By using annotation categories that were determined with the variants effect predictor software and datasets indicating regions of open chromatin, "low impact" variants were found to be highly enriched. Moreover, when the variants annotated as "modifier" and not located at open chromatin regions were further classified into different types of potential regulatory elements, the high impact variants, moderate impact variants, variants located in the 3' and 5' untranslated regions, and variants located in potential non-coding RNA regions exhibited relatively more enrichment. In contrast, a similar study on human GWAS data reported that enrichment of association signals was highest with high impact variants. We observed an increase in power when these variant category-based significance thresholds were applied for GWAS results on stature in Nordic Holstein cattle, as more candidate genes from previous large GWAS meta-analysis for cattle stature were confirmed.

conclusionsUse of variant category-based genome-wide significance thresholds can marginally increase the power to detect the candidate genes in cattle. With the continued improvements in annotation of the bovine genome, we anticipate that the growing usefulness of variant category-based significance thresholds will be demonstrated.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, GeneticAnimalsCattleGenome-Wide Association StudyMolecular Sequence AnnotationQuantitative Trait Loci

Identifiers

PMID31077144
PMCPMC6511139
OpenAlexW2946889322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.