ArticleBMC bioinformatics2019
pTrimmer: An efficient tool to trim primers of multiplex deep sequencing data.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Genotype-Phenotype Correlations in Plasma and Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- STRsensor: a computationally efficient method for STR allele-typing from massively parallel sequencing data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- How Gut Microbiome Perturbation Caused by Antibiotic Pre-Treatments Affected the Conjugative Transfer of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Local monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 variants in two large California counties in 2021.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Association between germline pathogenic variants and breast cancer risk in Japanese women: The HERPACC study.Cancer science · 2022Article
- The ViReflow pipeline enables user friendly large scale viral consensus genome reconstruction.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- COVID-19 Whole-Genome Resequencing with Redundant Tiling PCR and Subtract-Based Amplicon Normalization Successfully Characterized SARS-CoV-2 Variants in Clinical Specimens.Interdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases · 2022Article
- SARS-CoV-2 Genome Sequences, Including One with an ORF7a Deletion, Obtained from Patients in Bangladesh.Microbiology resource announcements · 2021Article
- Genome-resolved metagenomics using environmental and clinical samples.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021Review
- Rapid SARS-CoV-2 variant monitoring using PCR confirmed by whole genome sequencing in a high-volume diagnostic laboratory.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2021Article
- Evidence for increased breakthrough rates of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern in BNT162b2-mRNA-vaccinated individuals.Nature medicine · 2021Article
- Article
- A Large-Scale and Serverless Computational Approach for Improving Quality of NGS Data Supporting Big Multi-Omics Data Analyses.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Full genome viral sequences inform patterns of SARS-CoV-2 spread into and within Israel.Nature communications · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWith the widespread use of multiple amplicon-sequencing (MAS) in genetic variation detection, an efficient tool is required to remove primer sequences from short reads to ensure the reliability of downstream analysis. Although some tools are currently available, their efficiency and accuracy require improvement in trimming large scale of primers in high throughput target genome sequencing. This issue is becoming more urgent considering the potential clinical implementation of MAS for processing patient samples. We here developed pTrimmer that could handle thousands of primers simultaneously with greatly improved accuracy and performance.
resultpTrimmer combines the two algorithms of k-mers and Needleman-Wunsch algorithm, which ensures its accuracy even with the presence of sequencing errors. pTrimmer has an improvement of 28.59% sensitivity and 11.87% accuracy compared to the similar tools. The simulation showed pTrimmer has an ultra-high sensitivity rate of 99.96% and accuracy of 97.38% compared to cutPrimers (70.85% sensitivity rate and 58.73% accuracy). And the performance of pTrimmer is notably higher. It is about 370 times faster than cutPrimers and even 17,000 times faster than cutadapt per threads. Trimming 2158 pairs of primers from 11 million reads (Illumina PE 150 bp) takes only 37 s and no more than 100 MB of memory consumption.
conclusionspTrimmer is designed to trim primer sequence from multiplex amplicon sequencing and target sequencing. It is highly sensitive and specific compared to other three similar tools, which could help users to get more reliable mutational information for downstream analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.