ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2019
Data-Driven Flow Cytometry Analysis.
Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Detection of early-stage lung cancer in sputum using automated flow cytometry and machine learning.Respiratory research · 2023Trial
- Navigating the Landscape of Cytometry-Based Single-Cell Proteomics: Quantification, Annotation, and Resources.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Navigating the data processing for cytometry-based single-cell proteomics.Nature protocols · 2026Review
- ANPELA: Significantly Enhanced Quantification Tool for Cytometry-Based Single-Cell Proteomics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- PeacoQC: Peak-based selection of high quality cytometry data.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2022Article
- Key steps and methods in the experimental design and data analysis of highly multi-parametric flow and mass cytometry.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The emergence of flow and mass cytometry technologies capable of generating 40-dimensional data has spurred research into automated methodologies that address bottlenecks across the entire analysis process from quality checking, data transformation, and cell population identification, to biomarker identification and visualizations. We review these approaches in the context of the stepwise progression through the different steps, including normalization, automated gating, outlier detection, and graphical presentation of results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.