Trial reportPathology oncology research : POR2020
Predictive Value of ERCC1, ERCC2, and XRCC Expression for Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Gastric Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant mFOLFOX-4 Chemotherapy.
Trial report in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reversal of chemotherapy resistance in gastric cancer with traditional Chinese medicine as sensitizer: potential mechanism of action.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Deep learning nomogram for predicting neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in locally advanced gastric cancer patients.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2024Article
- Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Chemoresistance for Gastric Cancer.International journal of general medicine · 2024Review
- Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with arterial chemoembolization on short-term clinical outcome of locally advanced gastric cancer.BMC cancer · 2023Article
- HIF-1α Expression Increases Preoperative Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Resistance in Hyperglycemic Rectal Cancer.Cancers · 2022Article
- Review
- Surgical Efficacy and Safety of Patients with Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer following Neoadjuvant Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy and Chemotherapy.Journal of oncology · 2022Article
- Development and Validation of a Computed Tomography-Based Radiomics Signature to Predict Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer.JAMA network open · 2021Article
- Biomarker evaluation in radically resectable locally advanced gastric cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: an evidence reappraisal.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2021Review
- Clinical Effectiveness of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Gastric Carcinoma and Exploration of Perioperative Imaging Assessment Parameters.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2021Article
- Molecular Bases of Mechanisms Accounting for Drug Resistance in Gastric Adenocarcinoma.Cancers · 2020Review
- Observational Study Comparing Efficacy and Safety between Neoadjuvant Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy and Chemotherapy for Patients with Unresectable Locally Advanced or Metastatic Gastric Cancer.Journal of oncology · 2020Article
- AI-Powered Insights into Drug Resistance in Gastric Cancer: A Path Toward Precision Therapy.Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPRReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The dismal outcome in patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer (GC) highlights the need for effective systemic neoadjuvant chemotherapy to improve clinical results. This study evaluated the correlation between the expression of three DNA repair genes, namely the excision repair cross-complementing group 1 (ERCC1), excision repair cross-complementing group 2 (ERCC2), and X-ray repair cross-complementing protein 1 (XRCC1) and the clinical outcome of patients with locally advanced or metastatic GC treated with mFOLFOX-4 neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Fifty-eight patients with histologically confirmed locally advanced or metastatic GC following neoadjuvant mFOLFOX-4 chemotherapy were enrolled between January 2009 and January 2018. We analyzed clinicopathological features and ERCC1, ERCC2, and XRCC1 expression to identify potential predictors of clinical response. Among the 58 patients, 16 (27.6%) were categorized into the response group (partial response) and 42 into the nonresponse group (stable disease in 24 patients and progressive disease in 18 patients). A multivariate analysis showed that ERCC1 overexpression (P = 0.003), ERCC2 overexpression (P = 0.049), and either ERCC1 or ERCC2 overexpression (P = 0.002) were independent predictors of response following mFOLFOX-4 neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Additionally, ERCC1 and ERCC2 overexpression did not only predict the response but also progression-free survival (both P < 0.05) and overall survival (both P < 0.05). ERCC1 and ERCC2 overexpression are promising predictive biomarkers for patients with locally advanced or metastatic GC receiving neoadjuvant mFOLFOX-4 chemotherapy and the potential clinical implication is mandatory for further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31077069What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.