ReviewCurrent hematologic malignancy reports2019
Expert Panel Consensus Statement for Proper Evaluation of First Relapse in Multiple Myeloma.
Review in Current hematologic malignancy reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and temporal validation of a machine learning-based model for predicting renal impairment in multiple myeloma: a single-center retrospective cohort study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- [Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of first relapsed multiple myeloma in China (2026)].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2026Article
- Approaches To Managing Relapsed Myeloma: Switching Drug Class or Retreatment With Same Drug Class?Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2025Review
- Daratumumab-based regimens for patients with multiple myeloma plus extramedullary plasmacytomas or paraskeletal plasmacytomas: initial follow-up of an Italian multicenter observational clinical experience.Annals of hematology · 2024Observational
- [Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of first relapsed multiple myeloma in China (2022)].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2022Article
- Correlations between apparent diffusion coefficient values of WB-DWI and clinical parameters in multiple myeloma.BMC medical imaging · 2021Article
- Treatment of Lenalidomide Exposed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Network Meta-Analysis of Lenalidomide-Sparing Regimens.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Daratumumab as Single Agent in Relapsed/Refractory Myeloma Patients: A Retrospective Real-Life Survey.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Monoclonal Antibodies: Leading Actors in the Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Treatment.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma.Blood research · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewA working group of six expert physicians convened to assess the spectrum of multiple myeloma relapse presentations, discussed the features that can define the disease as aggressive and not aggressive, and established whether this information could help in selecting treatment together with the characteristics of disease and of patients and type of prior therapy. RECENT
findingsThe working group agreed that relapse should be distinguished between biochemical and clinical according to IMWG. Moreover, the expert panel defined "aggressive disease" as a clinical condition that requires therapy able to induce a rapid and as deep as possible response to release symptoms and to avoid impending danger of new events. According to this definition, relapse was considered aggressive if it presents with at least one of the following features: doubling of M protein rate over 2 months, renal insufficiency, hypercalcemia, extramedullary disease, elevated LDH, high plasma cell proliferative index, presence of plasma cells in peripheral blood, or skeletal-related complications. Moreover, the panel agreed that this classification can be useful to choose therapy in first relapse together with other patient, disease, and prior therapy characteristics. So, this item was included in a new therapeutic algorithm. The treatment choice in MM at relapse is wider than in the past with the availability of many new therapeutic regimens leading to increased diversity of approaches and relevant risk of inappropriate treatment decisions. A practical classification of relapses into aggressive or non-aggressive, included in a decisional algorithm on MM management at first relapse, could help to make the appropriate treatment decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.