ReviewCurrent treatment options in gastroenterology2019
Durability of Endoscopic Treatment for Dysplastic Barrett's Esophagus.
Review in Current treatment options in gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis review discusses the durability of the neo-squamous esophageal epithelium following endoscopic eradication therapy of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus. Our review will focus primarily on patients treated with radiofrequency ablation; however, we describe the known durability of cryotherapy. Additionally, we discuss the utility of novel imaging technologies and the efficacy of chemopreventive medications following endoscopic ablation. RECENT
findingsMounting data describe the durability of the post-ablation esophagus. Dysplastic Barrett's esophagus and adenocarcinoma following ablation are rare. New data emphasize that most recurrent disease occurs in the initial year following treatment. Additionally, recent publications suggest that a much-attenuated surveillance interval may provide adequate detection of neoplasia with many fewer surveillance endoscopies. Future guidelines will likely liberalize surveillance intervals following endoscopic eradication therapy. Additionally, further longitudinal studies will need to assess the length of time for which surveillance is indicated. The utility of chemopreventive strategies and adjunctive imaging modalities in the maintenance and surveillance of the post-ablation esophagus also remain unclear and will be areas for future investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31077058What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.