Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31077010›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2019

Patient-centered communication, patient satisfaction, and retention in care in assisted reproductive technology visits.

L Borghi, D Leone, S Poli, C Becattini, E Chelo, M Costa, L De Lauretis, A P Ferraretti, C Filippini, G Giuffrida and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Insights Into the Expectations of Infertile Men Regarding Multidisciplinary Reproductive Health Services.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

L BorghiDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Milan, 20142, Milan, Italy. lidia.borghi@unimi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9581-9921
D LeoneDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Milan, 20142, Milan, Italy.
S PoliDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Milan, 20142, Milan, Italy.
C BecattiniFutura Assisted Reproductive Center, 50129, Florence, Italy.
E CheloDemetra Assisted Reproductive Center, 50141, Florence, Italy.
M CostaOspedale Evangelico Internazionale, Assisted Reproductive Unit, 16122, Genoa, Italy.
L De LauretisIstituto Clinico Città Studi, Assisted Reproductive Center, 20131, Milan, Italy.
A P FerrarettiS.I.S.Me.R. Reproductive Medicine Unit, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
C FilippiniDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126, Turin, Italy.
G GiuffridaCRA, Assisted Reproductive center, 95128, Catania, Italy.
C LiviDemetra Assisted Reproductive Center, 50141, Florence, Italy.
A LuehwinkAzienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari-Provincia Autonoma di Trento, Assisted Reproductive Unit, 38123, Arco, Italy.
R PalermoAmbra Assisted Reproductive Center, 90138, Palermo, Italy.
A RevelliGynecology and Obstetrics I, Physiopathology of Reproduction and IVF Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, S. Anna Hospital, University of Torino, 10126, Torino, Italy.
G TomasiCRA, Assisted Reproductive center, 95128, Catania, Italy.
F TomeiAzienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria degli Angeli, 33170, Pordenone, Italy.
E VegniDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Milan, 20142, Milan, Italy.
University of Milan · ITUniversity of Turin · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria Degli Angeli · ITIstituto di Sessuologia Clinica · ITProvincia Autonoma di Trento · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo explore the association between patient-centered communication, patients' satisfaction, and retention in care in assisted reproductive technology (ART) visits.

methodsART visits at eight Italian clinics were videotaped and coded using the Roter Interaction Analysis System, which includes a Patient-Centered Index (PCI), a summary "patient-centered communication" ratio. After the visit, patients completed a satisfaction questionnaire (SATQ). After 3 months, patients were asked about their retention in care. Spearman correlations and Mann-Whitney tests were used to test associations between the study variables; the open-ended item of SATQ was analyzed through content analysis.

resultsEighty-five visits were videotaped (involving 28 gynecologists and 160 patients). PCI score (μ = 0.51 ± 0.28) revealed a more disease-oriented communication during the visit. Patients reported high levels of satisfaction with the visit and identified in the information provision or in the doctor's humanity or kindness the main reasons of satisfaction. At the follow-up, the majority of the couples declared to have followed the clinicians' recommendations and to have remained related to the ART center. No associations were found among the study variables, except for a lower male satisfaction among couples who declared to have changed ART clinic.

conclusionsContrary to what was expected, the style of physician-patient communication was not found to be associated with patient satisfaction and retention in care. However, patients were highly satisfied and engaged. The actual meaning of a communication that is "patient-centered" in the ART context might be wider, including the couples' need for information, as suggested by qualitative findings.

Indexed as

Patient-Centered CarePatient SatisfactionRetention in CareAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedPhysician-Patient RelationsReproductive Techniques, AssistedSurveys and QuestionnairesAssisted reproductive technologyDoctor-patient interactionPatient-centered communicationRetention in careRIASSatisfaction

Identifiers

PMID31077010
PMCPMC6603100
OpenAlexW2944287325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.