Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31076946›Full record

ReviewJournal of anesthesia2019

Infraclavicular brachial plexus block in adults: a comprehensive review based on a unified nomenclature system.

An-Chih Hsu, Yu-Ting Tai, Ko-Huan Lin, Han-Yun Yao, Han-Liang Chiang, Bing-Ying Ho, Sheng-Feng Yang, Jui-An Lin, Ching-Lung Ko

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of anesthesia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Ultrasound-Guided Brachial Plexus Block by Costoclavicular Space Approach: A Narrative Review.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

An-Chih HsuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yu-Ting TaiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ko-Huan LinDivision of Psychiatry, Hualien Armed Forces General Hospital, Hualien, Taiwan.
Han-Yun YaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Han-Liang ChiangDepartment of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Defense Medicine Center, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-9342-9671
Bing-Ying HoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Sheng-Feng YangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Jui-An LinDepartment of Anesthesiology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan. juian.lin@tmu.edu.tw.ORCID 0000-0003-0855-4828
Ching-Lung KoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan. clko1168@gmail.com.
Wan Fang Hospital · TWTaipei Medical University Hospital · TWHualien Armed Forces General Hospital · TWKaohsiung Veterans General Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last decade, considerable progress has been made regarding infraclavicular brachial plexus block (ICB) in adults, especially since the introduction of ultrasound guidance. The advancements in ICB have been attributed to the development of various approaches to improve the success rate and reduce complications. This has also necessitated a unified nomenclature system to facilitate comparison among different approaches. This review aimed to propose an anatomical nomenclature system by classifying ICB approaches into proximal and distal ones to aid future research and provide practice advisories according to recent updates. We also comprehensively discuss various aspects of this nomenclature system. Our review suggests that ultrasound-guided ICB should be categorized as an advanced technique that should be performed under supervision and dual guidance. For one-shot block, the conventional distal approach is still preferred but should be modified to follow ergonomic practice, with the arm in the proper position. For continuous ICB, the proximal approach is promising for reducing local anesthetic volume and increasing efficacy. Nevertheless, further studies are warranted in this direction. We provide practice advisories to maximize safety and minimize adverse events, and recommend designing future studies on ICB according to these findings based on the unified nomenclature system.

Indexed as

AdultAnesthetics, LocalBrachial Plexus BlockHumansUltrasonography, InterventionalAnesthetics, LocalAdultBrachial plexus blockInfraclavicularTerminology

Identifiers

PMID31076946
OpenAlexW2944788042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.