Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31076945›Full record

ArticleClinical rheumatology2019

Efficacy of rituximab in resistant palindromic rheumatism: first report in literature.

Padmaja Raghavan, Sreelakshmi Sreenath, Somy Cherian, Padmanabha D Shenoy

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Iguratimod efficacy in palindromic rheumatism treatment.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Padmaja RaghavanCentre for Arthritis & Rheumatism Excellence (CARE), Cochin, India.
Sreelakshmi SreenathCentre for Arthritis & Rheumatism Excellence (CARE), Cochin, India.
Somy CherianCentre for Arthritis & Rheumatism Excellence (CARE), Cochin, India.
Padmanabha D ShenoyCentre for Arthritis & Rheumatism Excellence (CARE), Cochin, India. drdpshenoy@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7666-1361
Arthritis and Rheumatism Associates · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRituximab (RTX) provides significant clinical benefits in active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with inadequate response to DMARDs and anti-TNF. There is no data regarding efficacy of RTX in seropositive Palindromic Rheumatism (PR), a forerunner of RA.

aimTo determine the efficacy and safety of RTX treatment in active PR patients exhibiting inadequate response to conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs).

methodsThe retrospective study, over a period of 3 years, included seropositive (RF ± antiCCP) PR patients with inadequate control of PR (> 4 attacks per months) despite combination csDMARDs and were treated with RTX. All the patients were treated with an initial dose of 500 mg RTX and later with a second infusion after 2 weeks' period in those who did not achieve adequate/ complete disease control. Patients were continued on csDMARDS and retreated with RTX on relapse of symptoms.

resultsThirty-three seropositive PR patients with a mean age of 48.15 ± 14.2 years, mean disease duration of 68.4 ± 68.2 months, mean follow up period of 24.3 ± 10.8 months, were treated with RTX. 88% patients were on combination DMARDS and 79% patients were females. All patient achieved rapid and complete control of palindromic attacks with RTX. Fifteen patients had a relapse after a mean duration of 10.4 ± 5.5 months and needed repeat RTX infusions following which remission was achieved. None of the patients progressed to RA till the end of the follow-up. No serious adverse effects were recorded.

conclusionRTX treatment could be effective in achieving disease control in active palindromic rheumatism not responding to csDMARDs. KEY POINTS: • PR is thought to be a forerunner of RA and rituximab (RTX) has been found to be effective in RA. • Our study supports the hypothesis that B cells play an important role in the pathophysiology of PR and that the combination (RTX+ conventional drugs) can prevent the disease evolution into RA. • This 3-year retrospective study showed that rituximab was found to be effective in those who responded poorly to conventional drugs and remission was achieved in all patients. • Although it is a rare disease, we see palindromic rheumatism patients in India more often. As the symptoms are very debilitating in these patients, in those patients, not controlled on conventional drugs, rituximab offers newer promise in controlling the attacks and prevents further progression to RA.

Indexed as

AdultAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRituximabTreatment OutcomeAntirheumatic AgentsRituximabcsDMARDsPalindromic rheumatismRheumatoid arthritisRituximab

Identifiers

PMID31076945
OpenAlexW2944716420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.