Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31076853›Full record

ReviewClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2019

Significance of psychosocial factors in cardiology: update 2018 : Position paper of the German Cardiac Society.

Christian Albus, Christiane Waller, Kurt Fritzsche, Hilka Gunold, Markus Haass, Bettina Hamann, Ingrid Kindermann, Volker Köllner, Boris Leithäuser, Nikolaus Marx and 8 more

Abstract readReviewConsensus Statement
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. 2024 Thai guidelines on the treatment of hypertension.Asian biomedicine : research, reviews and news · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Christian AlbusDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpenerstr. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany. christian.albus@uk-koeln.de.
Christiane WallerDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg General Hospital, Nuremberg, Germany.
Kurt FritzscheDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Hilka GunoldDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Markus HaassDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care, Theresienkrankenhaus, Mannheim, Germany.
Bettina HamannDepartment of Psychocardiology, Kerckhoff-Klinik, Bad Nauheim, Germany.
Ingrid KindermannDepartment of Internal Medicine III (Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care), Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Volker KöllnerDepartment of Psychosomatics and Behavioural Medicine, Seehof Rehabilitation Center, Teltow, Germany.
Boris LeithäuserPreventive Care Center, Cardiovascular Practice, Hamburg, Germany.
Nikolaus MarxDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Malte MeesmannDepartment of Cardiology, Juliusspital, Würzburg, Germany.
Matthias MichalDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Joram RonelDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Clinic Barmelweid, Erlinsbach, Switzerland.
Martin SchererInstitute and Clinic of General Practice and Primary Care, Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Volker SchraderCardiopulmonary Practice, Nuremberg, Germany.
Bernhard SchwaabCurschmann Klinik, Timmendorfer Strand, Germany.
Cora Stefanie WeberDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Hennigsdorf Hospital, Hennigsdorf, Germany.
Christoph Herrmann-LingenDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Göttingen Medical Centre and German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), partner site, Göttingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPsychosocial factors in cardiovascular diseases are increasingly acknowledged by patients, health care providers and payer organizations. Due to the rapidly increasing body of evidence, the German Cardiac Society has commissioned an update of its 2013 position paper on this topic. The German version was published in 2018 and the current manuscript is an extended translation of the original version.

methodsThis position paper provides a synopsis of the state of knowledge regarding psychosocial factors in the most relevant cardiovascular diseases and gives recommendations with respect to their consideration in clinical practice.

resultsPsychosocial factors such as low socioeconomic status, acute and chronic stress, depression, anxiety and low social support are associated with an unfavorable prognosis. Psychosocial problems and mental comorbidities should be assessed routinely to initiate targeted diagnostics and treatment. For all patients, treatment should consider age and gender differences as well as individual patient preferences. Multimodal treatment concepts should comprise education, physical exercise, motivational counseling and relaxation training or stress management. In cases of mental comorbidities, brief psychosocial interventions by primary care providers or cardiologists, regular psychotherapy and/or medications should be offered. While these interventions have positive effects on psychological symptoms, robust evidence for possible effects on cardiac outcomes is still lacking.

conclusionsFor coronary heart disease, chronic heart failure, arterial hypertension, and some arrhythmias, there is robust evidence supporting the relevance of psychosocial factors, pointing to a need for considering them in cardiological care. However, there are still shortcomings in implementing psychosocial treatment, and prognostic effects of psychotherapy and psychotropic drugs remain uncertain. There is a need for enhanced provider education and more treatment trials.

Indexed as

CardiologySocieties, MedicalAttitude of Health PersonnelCardiovascular DiseasesGermanyHumansMental DisordersSocioeconomic FactorsCardiologyPatient carePsychopharmacologyPsychosocial risk factorsPsychotherapy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.