ReviewCurrent genetics2019
RNA insertion in DNA as the imprint moiety: the fission yeast paradigm.
Review in Current genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fission yeast Swi2 designates cell-type specific donor and stimulates Rad51-driven strand exchange for mating-type switching.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- The Fission Yeast Mating-Type Switching Motto: "One-for-Two" and "Two-for-One".Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review elaborates on the findings of a new report which possibly resolves the biochemical nature of a novel type of DNA imprint as ribonucleotide and the mechanism of its formation during cell differentiation in fission yeast. The process of mating-type switching in fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, displays characteristics of a typical mammalian stem cell lineage, wherein a cell divides to produce an identical cell and a differentiated cell after every two cell divisions. This developmental asymmetry has been ascribed to play a role in generation of a DNA strand-specific imprint at the mat1 locus during lagging strand synthesis and its segregation to one of the two daughter cells by the process of asymmetric, semi-conservative DNA replication. The nature of this imprint and mechanisms of its generation have been a subject of research and debate. A recent report by Singh et al. (Nucleic Acids Res 47:3422-3433. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz092 , 2019) provides compelling evidence in support of a ribonucleotide as the imprint moiety within the mat1 DNA and demonstrates the role of Mcm10/Cdc23, an important, evolutionarily conserved component of DNA replication machinery in eukaryotes, in installing the imprint through a non-canonical primase activity and interaction with DNA Polα and Swi1. The high degree of conservation of DNA replication machinery, especially the presence of the T7 gene 4 helicase/primase domain in the mammalian orthologs of Mcm10 suggests that similar mechanisms of DNA imprinting may play a role during cell differentiation in metazoans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.