Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31076843›Full record

ReviewCurrent genetics2019

An evolving view of copy number variants.

Stephanie Lauer, David Gresham

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Whole genome analysis of toxic Papilionidae butterflies utilizing aristolochic acid, Pachliopta aristolochiae, and Byasa alcinous.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Copy Number Variant Duplications Associated with Essential Tremor.Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stephanie LauerInstitute for Systems Genetics, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
David GreshamCenter for Genomics and System Biology, Department of Biology, New York University, New York, NY, USA. dgresham@nyu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4028-0364

Funding

Regulation of Quiescence in Eukaryotic CellsR01GM107466 · NIGMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI GRESHAM, DAVID · 2013 to 2022
$3.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM107466
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Copy number variants (CNVs) are regions of the genome that vary in integer copy number. CNVs, which comprise both amplifications and deletions of DNA sequence, have been identified across all domains of life, from bacteria and archaea to plants and animals. CNVs are an important source of genetic diversity, and can drive rapid adaptive evolution and progression of heritable and somatic human diseases, such as cancer. However, despite their evolutionary importance and clinical relevance, CNVs remain understudied compared to single-nucleotide variants (SNVs). This is a consequence of the inherent difficulties in detecting CNVs at low-to-intermediate frequencies in heterogeneous populations of cells. Here, we discuss molecular methods used to detect CNVs, the limitations associated with using these techniques, and the application of new and emerging technologies that present solutions to these challenges. The goal of this short review and perspective is to highlight aspects of CNV biology that are understudied and define avenues for further research that address specific gaps in our knowledge of these complex alleles. We describe our recently developed method for CNV detection in which a fluorescent gene functions as a single-cell CNV reporter and present key findings from our evolution experiments in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Using a CNV reporter, we found that CNVs are generated at a high rate and undergo selection with predictable dynamics across independently evolving replicate populations. Many CNVs appear to be generated through DNA replication-based processes that are mediated by the presence of short, interrupted, inverted-repeat sequences. Our results have important implications for the role of CNVs in evolutionary processes and the molecular mechanisms that underlie CNV formation. We discuss the possible extension of our method to other applications, including tracking the dynamics of CNVs in models of human tumors.

Indexed as

AnimalsDNA Copy Number VariationsDNA ReplicationEvolution, MolecularFlow CytometryGene DosageGenes, ReporterGenomicsHumansInverted Repeat SequencesMicroscopy, FluorescencePhenotypeSaccharomyces cerevisiaeCancerChemostatCopy number variationEvolutionGene amplificationGene deletion

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.