Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31076823›Full record

ReviewHerz2019

[Left atrial appendage closure in non-valvular atrial fibrillation].

K G Häusler, U Landmesser

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Herz, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

K G HäuslerNeurologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Würzburg, Deutschland. Haeusler_K@ukw.de.
U LandmesserMedizinische Klinik für Kardiologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation is the most frequent cardiac arrhythmia worldwide, causing approximately 20% of all ischemic strokes. Therefore, oral anticoagulation is recommended in patients with atrial fibrillation with at least a moderate risk of stroke; however, there is a significant proportion of patients who cannot undergo long-term oral anticoagulation. As the left atrial appendage is of major relevance for atrial fibrillation-induced thrombus formation, catheter-based or surgical closure of the left atrial appendage appears to be a promising therapeutic option. Large registry studies including patients with catheter-based left atrial appendage closure have proven its effectiveness and a decreasing procedure-related complication rate. This review article summarizes the current knowledge and introduces major ongoing randomized studies, which will investigate the impact of left atrial appendage closure on stroke prevention. The authors hope that the results of the randomized CLOSURE AF trial, which is funded by the German Center for Cardiovascular Research e. V. and is now recruiting patients in Germany, will help to solve many of the currently prevalent clinical questions.

Indexed as

Atrial AppendageAtrial FibrillationStrokeAnticoagulantsGermanyHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeAnticoagulantsAnticoagulationCardiac arrhythmiaCardiac source of embolismCLOSURE-AF studyStroke

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.