ReviewDer Internist2019
[Cardiac troponins and beyond in acute coronary syndrome].
Review in Der Internist, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac biomarkers are an integral component of the diagnostic work-up of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Cardiac troponin (cTn) is the most sensitive diagnostic biomarker for patients with ACS and enables the differentiation of acute non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) from unstable angina. All cardiac and non-cardiac differential diagnoses must be taken into consideration. The use of cTn has a prognostic value in a multitude of acute and chronic diseases apart from ACS. Highly sensitive cTn (hsTn) assays should be preferentially used. Point-of-care (POC) troponin assays can be used for rule-in of acute MI but are generally not useful for rule-out of MI due to their lack of sensitivity compared to hsTn assays. This, however, may change with recent developments of newer and improved POC troponin assays. For exclusion of MI using hsTn assays, there are various protocols available, such as the instant rule-out with undetectable hsTn levels at admission or normal hsTn/cTn levels combined with normal copeptin levels or rule-out with serial controls of hsTn after 1, 2 or 3 h. This article provides an overview of guideline-recommended rule-out protocols for patients with suspected ACS and discusses recent advances in POC troponin assays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.