Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31076759›Full record

ArticleDiseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus2020

Disparities in esophageal cancer: less treatment, less surgical resection, and poorer survival in disadvantaged patients.

Francisco Schlottmann, Charles Gaber, Paula D Strassle, Fernando A M Herbella, Daniela Molena, Marco G Patti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Providers' and survivors' perspectives on the availability and accessibility of surgery in gastrointestinal cancer care.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Disparities in thoracic surgical oncology.Journal of surgical oncology · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Francisco SchlottmannDepartment of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Charles GaberDepartment of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Paula D StrassleDepartment of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Fernando A M HerbellaDepartment of Surgery, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Daniela MolenaDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Marco G PattiDepartment of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence of esophageal cancer has increased steadily in the last decades in the United States. The aim of this paper was to characterize disparities in esophageal cancer treatment in different racial and socioeconomic population groups and compare long-term survival among different treatment modalities. A retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Database was performed including adult patients (≥18 years old) with a diagnosis of resectable (stages I-III) esophageal cancer between 2004 and 2015. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine the odds of being offered no treatment at all and surgical treatment across race, primary insurance, travel distance, income, and education levels. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare 5-year survival rates across different treatment modalities. A total of 60,621 esophageal cancer patients were included. Black patients, uninsured patients, and patients living in areas with lower levels of education were more likely to be offered no treatment. Similarly, black race, female patients, nonprivately insured patients, and those living in areas with lower median residential income and lower education levels were associated with lower rates of surgery. Patients receiving surgical treatment, compared to both no treatment and definitive chemoradiation, had significant better long-term survival in stage I, II, and III esophageal cancer. In conclusion, underserved patients with esophageal cancer appear to have limited access to surgical care, and are, in fact, more likely to not be offered any treatment at all. Considering the survival benefits associated with surgical resection, greater public health efforts to reduce disparities in esophageal cancer are needed.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsEthnicityHealth Status DisparitiesSocial Determinants of HealthSocioeconomic FactorsVulnerable PopulationsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChemoradiotherapyDatabases, FactualEsophagectomyFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Services Accessibilitydisparityesophageal cancersurgerysurvival

Identifiers

PMID31076759
PMCPMC8205620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.