Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31076742›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2020

Universal Tumor DNA BRCA1/2 Testing of Ovarian Cancer: Prescreening PARPi Treatment and Genetic Predisposition.

Janet R Vos, Ingrid E Fakkert, Joanne A de Hullu, Anne M van Altena, Aisha S Sie, Hicham Ouchene, Riki W Willems, Iris D Nagtegaal, Marjolijn C J Jongmans, Arjen R Mensenkamp and 8 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Cancers · 2024
    Article
  19. Review
  20. International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Janet R VosDepartment of Human Genetics.
Ingrid E FakkertDepartment of Human Genetics.
Joanne A de HulluDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Anne M van AltenaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Aisha S SieDepartment of Human Genetics.
Hicham OucheneDepartment of Human Genetics.
Riki W WillemsDepartment of Pathology.
Iris D NagtegaalDepartment of Pathology.
Marjolijn C J JongmansDepartment of Human Genetics.
Arjen R MensenkampDepartment of Human Genetics.
Gwendolyn H WoldringhDepartment of Human Genetics.
Johan BultenDepartment of Pathology.
Edward M LeterRadboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Department of Clinical Genetics (EML), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
C Marleen KetsDepartment of Human Genetics.
Michiel SimonsDepartment of Pathology.
Marjolijn J L LigtenbergDepartment of Human Genetics.
Nicoline HoogerbruggeDepartment of Human Genetics.
OPA Working Group
Radboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen with epithelial ovarian cancer (OC) have a higher chance to benefit from poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) therapy if their tumor has a somatic or hereditary BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant. Current guidelines advise BRCA1/2 genetic predisposition testing for all OC patients, though this does not detect somatic variants. We assessed the feasibility of a workflow for universal tumor DNA BRCA1/2 testing of all newly diagnosed OC patients as a prescreen for PARPi treatment and cancer predisposition testing.

methodsFormalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue was obtained from OC patients in seven hospitals immediately after diagnosis or primary surgery. DNA was extracted, and universal tumor BRCA1/2 testing was then performed in a single site. Diagnostic yield, uptake, referral rates for genetic predisposition testing, and experiences of patients and gynecologists were evaluated.

resultsTumor BRCA1/2 testing was performed for 315 (77.6%) of the 406 eligible OC samples, of which 305 (96.8%) were successful. In 51 of these patients, pathogenic variants were detected (16.7%). Most patients (88.2%) went on to have a genetic predisposition test. BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants were shown to be hereditary in 56.8% and somatic in 43.2% of patients. Participating gynecologists and patients were overwhelmingly positive about the workflow.

conclusionsUniversal tumor BRCA1/2 testing in all newly diagnosed OC patients is feasible, effective, and appreciated by patients and gynecologists. Because many variants cannot be detected in DNA from blood, testing tumor DNA as the first step can double the identification rate of patients who stand to benefit most from PARP inhibitors.

Indexed as

AgedBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinDisease ManagementFemaleGenetic CounselingGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingHumansMiddle AgedMolecular Targeted TherapyOvarian NeoplasmsPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID31076742
PMCPMC7019087
OpenAlexW2944695242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.