Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31076646›Full record

ReviewMolecular psychiatry2019

Models of persecutory delusions: a mechanistic insight into the early stages of psychosis.

Andreea Oliviana Diaconescu, Daniel Jonas Hauke, Stefan Borgwardt

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Social reward, punishment, and prosociality in paranoia.Journal of abnormal psychology · 2021
    Article
  16. Derationalizing Delusions.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Andreea Oliviana DiaconescuDepartment of Psychiatry (UPK), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. andreea.diaconescu@upkbs.ch.
Daniel Jonas HaukeDepartment of Psychiatry (UPK), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Stefan BorgwardtDepartment of Psychiatry (UPK), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
University of Basel · CHETH Zurich · CH

Funding

Swiss National Science Foundation 167952
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying robust markers for predicting the onset of psychosis has been a key challenge for early detection research. Persecutory delusions are core symptoms of psychosis, and social cognition is particularly impaired in first-episode psychosis patients and individuals at risk for developing psychosis. Here, we propose new avenues for translation provided by hierarchical Bayesian models of behaviour and neuroimaging data applied in the context of social learning to target persecutory delusions. As it comprises a mechanistic model embedded in neurophysiology, the findings of this approach may shed light onto inference and neurobiological causes of transition to psychosis.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnxietyBayes TheoremCognitive Behavioral TherapyComputational BiologyDelusionsFemaleHumansMaleModels, TheoreticalParanoid DisordersPsychotic DisordersRisk FactorsSocial Behavior

Identifiers

PMID31076646
PMCPMC6756090
OpenAlexW2944116936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.