Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31076597›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Chronic neuromuscular electrical stimulation improves muscle mass and insulin sensitivity in a mouse model.

Adiel Lotri-Koffi, Marion Pauly, Emeline Lemarié, Diane Godin-Ribuot, Renaud Tamisier, Jean-Louis Pépin, Isabelle Vivodtzev

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Adiel Lotri-KoffiUniv. Grenoble Alpes, Inserm 1042, CHU Grenoble Alpes, HP2 Laboratory, Grenoble, France.
Marion PaulyUniv. Grenoble Alpes, Inserm 1042, CHU Grenoble Alpes, HP2 Laboratory, Grenoble, France.
Emeline LemariéUniv. Grenoble Alpes, Inserm 1042, CHU Grenoble Alpes, HP2 Laboratory, Grenoble, France.
Diane Godin-RibuotUniv. Grenoble Alpes, Inserm 1042, CHU Grenoble Alpes, HP2 Laboratory, Grenoble, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7589-932X
Renaud TamisierUniv. Grenoble Alpes, Inserm 1042, CHU Grenoble Alpes, HP2 Laboratory, Grenoble, France.
Jean-Louis PépinUniv. Grenoble Alpes, Inserm 1042, CHU Grenoble Alpes, HP2 Laboratory, Grenoble, France.
Isabelle VivodtzevUniv. Grenoble Alpes, Inserm 1042, CHU Grenoble Alpes, HP2 Laboratory, Grenoble, France. ivivodtzev@partners.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5201-8603
Inserm · FRHarvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Muscle wasting reduces functional capacity and increases cardiometabolic risk in chronic disease. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) of the lower limb has been shown to reverse muscle wasting in these patients but its effect on cardiometabolic health is unclear. We investigated a mouse model of in-vivo non-invasive chronic NMES on muscle mass, insulin sensitivity and arterial blood pressure (BP). Twenty-three C57BL6 mice underwent unilateral NMES or sham training over 2.5 weeks while anesthetized by isoflurane. Lower limb muscle mass and the stimulated limb to non-stimulated limb muscle mass ratio were compared between groups (NMES vs. sham). Insulin sensitivity was assessed 48 h after training using an intraperitoneal insulin tolerance test (ITT) and BP was assessed before and after training using the tail-cuff technique. After training, muscle mass increased in NMES vs. sham (416 ± 6 vs. 397 ± 6 mg, p = 0.04) along with the ratio of muscle mass (+3 ± 1% vs. -1 ± 1% p = 0.04). Moreover, insulin sensitivity improved in NMES vs. sham (average blood glucose during ITT: 139.6 ± 8.5 vs. 161.9 ± 9.0 mg/dl blood, p = 0.01). BP was decreased in both groups, although it is likely that the effect of NMES on BP was dampened by repetitive anesthesia. The metabolic benefit of NMES training could be of great utility in patients with chronic disease. Moreover, the clinical-like mouse model of NMES is an effective tool to investigate the systemic effects of local muscle strengthening.

Indexed as

AnimalsElectric StimulationElectric Stimulation TherapyInsulin ResistanceLower ExtremityMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMuscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthMuscular Atrophy

Identifiers

PMID31076597
PMCPMC6510751
OpenAlexW2944679160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.