Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31076594›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Predatory bacteria can protect SKH-1 mice from a lethal plague challenge.

James S Findlay, Helen C Flick-Smith, Emma Keyser, Ian A Cooper, E Diane Williamson, Petra C F Oyston

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Microbiota diversity and anti-Applied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Biological Control ofMicroorganisms · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

James S FindlayCBR Division, Dstl Porton Down, Salisbury, SP4 0JQ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0796-5318
Helen C Flick-SmithCBR Division, Dstl Porton Down, Salisbury, SP4 0JQ, UK.
Emma KeyserCBR Division, Dstl Porton Down, Salisbury, SP4 0JQ, UK.
Ian A CooperCBR Division, Dstl Porton Down, Salisbury, SP4 0JQ, UK.
E Diane WilliamsonCBR Division, Dstl Porton Down, Salisbury, SP4 0JQ, UK.
Petra C F OystonCBR Division, Dstl Porton Down, Salisbury, SP4 0JQ, UK. p.c.oyston@dstl.gov.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the rise of antimicrobial resistance, novel ways to treat bacterial infections are required and the use of predatory bacteria may be one such approach. Bdellovibrio species have been shown in vitro to predate on a wide range of other Gram-negative bacteria, including CDC category A/B pathogens such as Yersinia pestis. The data reported here show that treatment of SKH-1 mice with Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus HD100 provided significant protection from a lethal challenge of Yersinia pestis CO92. This is the first report of protection conferred by predation in vivo against a systemic pathogen challenge. However, this protective effect was not observed in a preliminary study with Balb/c mice. Therefore the effects of the predatory bacteria are complex and may be dependent on immune status/genetics of the host. Overall, predatory bacteria may have utility as a therapeutic modality but further work is required to understand the predator-host interaction.

Indexed as

AnimalsBdellovibrio bacteriovorusDisease Models, AnimalMacrophagesMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred C57BLOptical ImagingPhagocytosisPlagueYersinia pestis

Identifiers

PMID31076594
PMCPMC6510791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.