Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31076430›Full record

ReviewApplied and environmental microbiology2019

Soil Aggregate Microbial Communities: Towards Understanding Microbiome Interactions at Biologically Relevant Scales.

Regina L Wilpiszeski, Jayde A Aufrecht, Scott T Retterer, Matthew B Sullivan, David E Graham, Eric M Pierce, Olivier D Zablocki, Anthony V Palumbo, Dwayne A Elias

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 102 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
102citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

102 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Enhanced Endophytic Colonization of Flavobacterium Promotes Plant Resistance to Fusarium Wilt.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Regina L WilpiszeskiBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9074-6479
Jayde A AufrechtBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.
Scott T RettererBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.
Matthew B SullivanDepartment of Microbiology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
David E GrahamBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8968-7344
Eric M PierceEnvironmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.
Olivier D ZablockiDepartment of Microbiology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Anthony V PalumboBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.
Dwayne A EliasBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA eliasda@ornl.gov.ORCID 0000-0002-4469-6391

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soils contain a tangle of minerals, water, nutrients, gases, plant roots, decaying organic matter, and microorganisms which work together to cycle nutrients and support terrestrial plant growth. Most soil microorganisms live in periodically interconnected communities closely associated with soil aggregates, i.e., small (<2 mm), strongly bound clusters of minerals and organic carbon that persist through mechanical disruptions and wetting events. Their spatial structure is important for biogeochemical cycling, and we cannot reliably predict soil biological activities and variability by studying bulk soils alone. To fully understand the biogeochemical processes at work in soils, it is necessary to understand the micrometer-scale interactions that occur between soil particles and their microbial inhabitants. Here, we review the current state of knowledge regarding soil aggregate microbial communities and identify areas of opportunity to study soil ecosystems at a scale relevant to individual cells. We present a framework for understanding aggregate communities as "microbial villages" that are periodically connected through wetting events, allowing for the transfer of genetic material, metabolites, and viruses. We describe both top-down (whole community) and bottom-up (reductionist) strategies for studying these communities. Understanding this requires combining "model system" approaches (e.g., developing mock community artificial aggregates), field observations of natural communities, and broader study of community interactions to include understudied community members, like viruses. Initial studies suggest that aggregate-based approaches are a critical next step for developing a predictive understanding of how geochemical and community interactions govern microbial community structure and nutrient cycling in soil.

Indexed as

Soil MicrobiologyEcosystemMicrobiotaSoilSoilmicrobial communitiessoilsoil aggregatevirus

Identifiers

PMID31076430
PMCPMC6606860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.