Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31076256›Full record

ArticleEpilepsy research2019

Harmonization of the pipeline for seizure detection to phenotype post-traumatic epilepsy in a preclinical multicenter study on post-traumatic epileptogenesis.

Pablo M Casillas-Espinosa, Pedro Andrade, Cesar Santana-Gomez, Tomi Paananen, Gregory Smith, Idrish Ali, Robert Ciszek, Xavier Ekolle Ndode-Ekane, Rhys D Brady, Jussi Tohka and 10 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsy research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. What value can TSPO PET bring for epilepsy treatment?European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Pablo M Casillas-EspinosaThe Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Australia.
Pedro AndradeA.I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Cesar Santana-GomezDepartment of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, United States.
Tomi PaananenA.I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Gregory SmithDepartment of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, United States.
Idrish AliThe Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Australia.
Robert CiszekA.I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Xavier Ekolle Ndode-EkaneA.I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Rhys D BradyThe Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Australia.
Jussi TohkaA.I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Matthew R HudsonThe Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Australia.
Piero PeruccaThe Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Australia; Department of Neurology, The Alfred Hospital, Commercial Road, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia; Department of Neurology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan Street, Parkville, Victoria, 3050, Australia.
Emma L BraineThe Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Australia.
Riikka ImmonenA.I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Noora PuhakkaA.I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Sandy R ShultzThe Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Australia.
Nigel C JonesThe Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Australia.
Richard J StabaDepartment of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, United States.
Asla PitkänenA.I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Terence J O'BrienThe Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Australia; Department of Neurology, The Alfred Hospital, Commercial Road, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia; Department of Neurology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan Street, Parkville, Victoria, 3050, Australia. Electronic address: Terence.OBrien@monash.edu.
The Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUUniversity of Eastern Finland · FIUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

The Epilepsy Bioinformatics Study for Antiepileptogenic Therapy (EpiBioS4Rx) Public Engagement CoreU54NS100064 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI ENGEL, JEROME NONE, GALANOPOULOU, ARISTEA S · 2017 to 2021
$21.7M
NINDS NIH HHS U54 NS100064
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleThe Epilepsy Bioinformatics Study for Antiepileptogenic Therapy (EpiBioS4Rx) Centre without walls is an NIH funded multicenter consortium. One of EpiBioS4Rx projects is a preclinical post-traumatic epileptogenesis biomarker study that involves three study sites: The University of Eastern Finland, Monash University (Melbourne) and the University of California Los Angeles. Our objective is to create a platform for evaluating biomarkers and testing new antiepileptogenic treatments for post-traumatic epilepsy (PTE) using the lateral fluid percussion injury (FPI) model in rats. As only 30-50% of rats with severe lateral FPI develop PTE by 6 months post-injury, prolonged video-EEG monitoring is crucial to identify animals with PTE. Our objective is to harmonize the surgical and data collection procedures, equipment, and data analysis for chronic EEG recording in order to phenotype PTE in this rat model across the three study sites.

methodsTraumatic brain injury (TBI) was induced using lateral FPI in adult male Sprague-Dawley rats aged 11-12 weeks. Animals were divided into two cohorts: a) the long-term video-EEG follow-up cohort (Specific Aim 1), which was implanted with EEG electrodes within 24 h after the injury; and b) the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) follow-up cohort (Specific Aim 2), at 5 months after lateral FPI. Four cortical epidural screw electrodes (2 ipsilateral, 2 contralateral) and three intracerebral bipolar electrodes were implanted (septal CA1 and the dentate gyrus, layers II and VI of the perilesional cortex both anterior and posterior to the injury site). During the 7th post-TBI month, animals underwent 4 weeks of continuous video-EEG recordings to diagnose of PTE.

resultsAll centers harmonized the induction of TBI and surgical procedures for the implantation of EEG recordings, utilizing 4 or more EEG recording channels to cover areas ipsilateral and contralateral to the brain injury, perilesional cortex and the hippocampus and dentate gyrus. Ground and reference screw electrodes were implanted. At all sites the minimum sampling rate was 512 Hz, utilizing a finite impulse response (FIR) and impedance below 10 KΩ through the entire recording. As part of the quality control criteria we avoided electrical noise, and monitoring changes in impedance over time and the appearance of noise on the recordings. To reduce electrical noise, we regularly checked the integrity of the cables, stability of the EEG recording cap and the appropriate connection of the electrodes with the cables. Following the pipeline presented in this article and after applying the quality control criteria to our EEG recordings all of the sites were successful to phenotype seizure in chronic EEG recordings of animals after TBI. DISCUSSION: Despite differences in video-EEG acquisition equipment used, the three centers were able to consistently phenotype seizures in the lateral fluid-percussion model applying the pipeline presented here. The harmonization of methodology will help to improve the rigor of preclinical research, improving reproducibility of pre-clinical research in the search of biomarkers and therapies to prevent antiepileptogenesis.

Indexed as

SeizuresAnimalsBiomarkersBrain Injuries, TraumaticCerebral CortexDisease Models, AnimalEpilepsy, Post-TraumaticMalePhenotypeRats, Sprague-DawleyVideo RecordingBiomarkersCommon data elementsElectroencephalogramPost-traumatic epilepsySeizuresTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID31076256
PMCPMC6814157
OpenAlexW2941507085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.