ArticleUltrasound in medicine & biology2019
Characterizing Fatty Liver in vivo in Rabbits, Using Quantitative Ultrasound.
Article in Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantitative Multifrequency Ultrasound Imaging Using Narrowband Pulsing for Tissue Characterization.Investigative radiology · 2026Article
- Assessing the benefits of using plane wave compounding when estimating backscatter coefficients with an in situ bead as a calibration target.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2026Article
- Metabolic dysfunction‑associated steatotic liver disease: Pathogenesis, model and treatment (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2025Review
- Toward Real-Time Backscatter Coefficient Estimation Incorporating the U-Net Segmentation and an In Vivo Reference Target.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2025Article
- Angular spatial compounding of diffraction corrected images improves ultrasound attenuation measurements.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2025Article
- Machine learning model for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis diagnosis based on ultrasound radiomics.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- In Vivo Validation of an In Situ Calibration Bead as a Reference for Backscatter Coefficient Calculation.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2024Article
- Spectral-based Quantitative Ultrasound Imaging Processing Techniques: Comparisons of RF Versus IQ Approaches.Ultrasonic imaging · 2024Article
- Calibrating Data Mismatches in Deep Learning-Based Quantitative Ultrasound Using Setting Transfer Functions.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2023Article
- A Data-Efficient Deep Learning Strategy for Tissue Characterization via Quantitative Ultrasound: Zone Training.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2023Article
- High-Resolution Ultrasound Characterization of Local Scattering in Cancer Tissue.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2023Article
- Extracting Quantitative Ultrasonic Parameters from the Backscatter Coefficient.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023Review
- Quantitative Ultrasound: An Emerging Technology for Detecting, Diagnosing, Imaging, Evaluating, and Monitoring Disease.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023Article
- Review
- Ultrasonic backscatter coefficient estimation in nonlinear regime using an in situ calibration target.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2022Article
- Identifying and overcoming limitations with in situ calibration beads for quantitative ultrasound.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2022Article
- Analytic Global Regularized Backscatter Quantitative Ultrasound.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2021Article
- Use of a convolutional neural network and quantitative ultrasound for diagnosis of fatty liver.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2021Article
- Multiparametric ultrasound imaging for the assessment of normal versus steatotic livers.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Quantitative ultrasound approaches for diagnosis and monitoring hepatic steatosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.Theranostics · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common cause of chronic liver disease and can often lead to fibrosis, cirrhosis, cancer and complete liver failure. Liver biopsy is the current standard of care to quantify hepatic steatosis, but it comes with increased patient risk and only samples a small portion of the liver. Imaging approaches to assess NAFLD include proton density fat fraction estimated via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and shear wave elastography. However, MRI is expensive and shear wave elastography is not proven to be sensitive to fat content of the liver (Kramer et al. 2016). On the other hand, ultrasonic attenuation and the backscatter coefficient (BSC) have been observed to be sensitive to levels of fat in the liver (Lin et al. 2015; Paige et al. 2017). In this study, we assessed the use of attenuation and the BSC to quantify hepatic steatosis in vivo in a rabbit model of fatty liver. Rabbits were maintained on a high-fat diet for 0, 1, 2, 3 or 6 wk, with 3 rabbits per diet group (total N = 15). An array transducer (L9-4) with a center frequency of 4.5 MHz connected to a SonixOne scanner was used to gather radio frequency (RF) backscattered data in vivo from rabbits. The RF signals were used to estimate an average attenuation and BSC for each rabbit. Two approaches were used to parameterize the BSC (i.e., the effective scatterer diameter and effective acoustic concentration using a spherical Gaussian model and a model-free approach using a principal component analysis [PCA]). The 2 major components of the PCA from the BSCs, which captured 96% of the variance of the transformed data, were used to generate input features to a support vector machine for classification. Rabbits were separated into two liver fat-level classes, such that approximately half of the rabbits were in the low-lipid class (≤9% lipid liver level) and half of the rabbits in the high-lipid class (>9% lipid liver level). The slope and the midband fit of the attenuation coefficient provided statistically significant differences (p value = 0.00014 and p value = 0.007, using a two-sample t test) between low and high-lipid fat classes. The proposed model-free and model-based parameterization of the BSC and attenuation coefficient parameters yielded classification accuracies of 84.11 %, 82.93 % and 78.91 % for differentiating low-lipid versus high-lipid classes, respectively. The results suggest that attenuation and BSC analysis can differentiate low-fat versus high-fat livers in a rabbit model of fatty liver disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.