Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31075863›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2019

Variability of Clinical Practice in the Third Stage of Labour in Spain.

Inmaculada Ortiz-Esquinas, Juan Gómez-Salgado, Ana I Pascual-Pedreño, Julián Rodríguez-Almagro, Juan Miguel Martínez-Galiano, Antonio Hernández-Martínez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Inmaculada Ortiz-EsquinasDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Alcázar de San Juan, 13600 Ciudad Real, Spain. inmaores@hotmail.com.
Juan Gómez-SalgadoDepartment of Sociology, Social Work and Public Health, University of Huelva, 21071 Huelva, Spain. salgado@uhu.es.ORCID 0000-0001-9053-7730
Ana I Pascual-PedreñoDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Alcázar de San Juan, 13600 Ciudad Real, Spain. ginemancha@hotmail.com.
Julián Rodríguez-AlmagroDepartment of Nursing, Ciudad Real Nursing School. University of Castilla-La Mancha, 13071 Ciudad Real, Spain. julianj.rodriguez@uclm.es.ORCID 0000-0002-6239-2842
Juan Miguel Martínez-GalianoDepartment of Nursing, University of Jaen, 23071 Jaen, Spain. jgaliano@ujaen.es.
Antonio Hernández-MartínezDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Alcázar de San Juan, 13600 Ciudad Real, Spain. antomatron@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9100-1134

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical practice guidelines recommend the active management of the third stage of labour, but it is currently unknown what practices professionals actually perform. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the variability of professional practices in the management of the third stage of labour and to identify any associated professional and work environment factors. A nationwide cross-sectional study was performed with 1054 obstetrics professionals between September and November 2018 in Spain. A self-designed questionnaire was administered online. The crude odds ratios (OR) and adjusted odds ratios (ORa) were estimated using binary logistic regression. The main outcome measures were included in the clinical management of the third stage of labour and they were: type of management, drugs, doses, routes of administration, and waiting times used. The results showed that 75.3% (783) of the professionals used uterotonic agents for delivery. Oxytocin was the most commonly administered drug. Professionals who attend home births were less likely to use uterotonics (ORa: 0.23; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.12-0.47), while those who completed their training after 2007 (ORa: 1.57 (95% CI: 1.13-2.18) and worked in a hospital that attended >4000 births per year (ORa: 7.95 CI: 4.02-15.72) were more likely to use them. Statistically significant differences were also observed between midwives and gynaecologists as for the clinical management of this stage of labour (

Indexed as

manual removal of placentapatient safetypostpartum haemorrhageprofessional practicequality improvementthird stage of labouruterotonic agents

Identifiers

PMID31075863
PMCPMC6571899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.