Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31075858›Full record

Trial reportNutrients2019

Appetitive Pavlovian-to-Instrumental Transfer in Participants with Normal-Weight and Obesity.

Marie-Theres Meemken, Annette Horstmann

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Enhanced Go and NoGo Learning in Individuals With Obesity.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marie-Theres MeemkenIFB Adiposity Diseases, Leipzig University Medical Center, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany. meemken@cbs.mpg.de.ORCID 0000-0003-3450-4330
Annette HorstmannIFB Adiposity Diseases, Leipzig University Medical Center, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany. horstmann@cbs.mpg.de.ORCID 0000-0001-6184-8484

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung FKZ: 01EO1501Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SFB1052/2 "Obesity Mechanisms", subproject A05.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Altered eating behavior due to modern, food-enriched environments has a share in the recent obesity upsurge, though the exact mechanisms remain unclear. This study aims to assess whether higher weight or weight gain are related to stronger effects of external cues on motivation-driven behavior. 51 people with and without obesity completed an appetitive Pavlovian-to-Instrumental Transfer (PIT) paradigm. During training, button presses as well as presentation of fractal images resulted in three palatable and one neutral taste outcome. In the subsequent test phase, outcome-specific and general behavioral bias of the positively associated fractal images on deliberate button press were tested under extinction. While all participants showed signs of specific transfer, general transfer was not elicited. Contrary to our expectations, there was no main effect of weight group on PIT magnitude. Participants with obesity exhibited higher scores in the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire Disinhibition scale, replicating a very robust effect from previous literature. Individual Restraint scores were able to predict body-mass index (BMI) change after a three-year period. Our data indicate that PIT is an important player in how our environment influences the initiation of food intake, but its effects alone cannot explain differences in-or future development of-individual weight.

Indexed as

AppetiteCuesFoodRewardTransfer, PsychologyAdultBody Mass IndexBody WeightConditioning, ClassicalCross-Sectional StudiesEatingEnvironmentFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansInhibition, Psychologicalfood rewardhumanobesityPavlovian-to-Instrumental TransferPIT

Identifiers

PMID31075858
PMCPMC6567236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.