ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2019
Research on Distinguishing Fish Meal Quality Using Different Characteristic Parameters Based on Electronic Nose Technology.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reconfigurable Multi-Channel Gas-Sensor Array for Complex Gas Mixture Identification and Fish Freshness Classification.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- AI-Driven Monitoring for Fish Welfare in Aquaponics: A Predictive Approach.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Intelligent Evaluation and Dynamic Prediction of Oysters Freshness with Electronic Nose Non-Destructive Monitoring and Machine Learning.Biosensors · 2024Article
- Intelligent Evaluation and Dynamic Prediction of Oyster Freshness with Electronic Nose Based on the Distribution of Volatile Compounds Using GC-MS Analysis.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Predicting the quality attributes related to geographical growing regions in red-fleshed kiwifruit by data fusion of electronic nose and computer vision systems.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- A data fusion approach for nondestructive tracking of the ripening process and quality attributes of green Hayward kiwifruit using artificial olfaction and proximal hyperspectral imaging techniques.Food science & nutrition · 2023Article
- Use of industry 4.0 technologies to reduce and valorize seafood waste and by-products: A narrative review on current knowledge.Current research in food science · 2023Review
- Rapid Non-Destructive Quantification of Eugenol in Curdlan Biofilms by Electronic Nose Combined with Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this paper, a portable electronic nose, that was independently developed, was employed to detect and classify a fish meal of different qualities. SPME-GC-MS (solid phase microextraction gas chromatography mass spectrometry) analysis of fish meal was presented. Due to the large amount of data of the original features detected by the electronic nose, a reasonable selection of the original features was necessary before processing, so as to reduce the dimension. The integral value, wavelet energy value, maximum gradient value, average differential value, relation steady-state response average value and variance value were selected as six different characteristic parameters, to study fish meal samples with different storage time grades. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), and five recognition modes, which included the multilayer perceptron neural network classification method, random forest classification method, k nearest neighbor algorithm, support vector machine algorithm, and Bayesian classification method, were employed for the classification. The result showed that the RF classification method had the highest accuracy rate for the classification algorithm. The highest accuracy rate for distinguishing fish meal samples with different qualities was achieved using the integral value, stable value, and average differential value. The lowest accuracy rate for distinguishing fish meal samples with different qualities was achieved using the maximum gradient value. This finding shows that the electronic nose can identify fish meal samples with different storage times.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.