ReviewCurrent opinion in psychology2019
Remapping locations and features across saccades: a dual-spotlight theory of attentional updating.
Review in Current opinion in psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Post-saccadic disruption of semantic category information in naturalistic scenes.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2026Article
- Top-down motivation both decreases and increases feature interference following a saccade.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026Article
- Article
- Perisaccadic Attentional Updating in Area V4: A Neurocomputational Approach.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Article
- Spatiotemporal predictability of saccades modulates postsaccadic feature interference.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- The influence of saccade target status on the reference frame of object-location binding.Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2025Article
- Saccades influence functional modularity in the human cortical vision network.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Representation of Stimulus Features during Stable Fixation and Active Vision.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Decoding Remapped Spatial Information in the Peri-Saccadic Period.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- A computational account of transsaccadic attentional allocation based on visual gain fields.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Feature-selective responses in macaque visual cortex follow eye movements during natural vision.Nature neuroscience · 2024Article
- Dynamic saccade context triggers more stable object-location binding.Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2024Article
- Occipital and parietal cortex participate in a cortical network for transsaccadic discrimination of object shape and orientation.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Dynamic neural reconstructions of attended object location and features using EEG.Journal of neurophysiology · 2023Article
- Bilateral increase in MEG planar gradients prior to saccade onset.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Attention as a multi-level system of weights and balances.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science · 2023Review
- Article
- The diachronic account of attentional selectivity.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2022Review
- Visual Remapping.Annual review of vision science · 2021Review
- Transsaccadic integration of visual information is predictive, attention-based, and spatially precise.Journal of vision · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
How do we maintain visual stability across eye movements? Much work has focused on how visual information is rapidly updated to maintain spatiotopic representations. However, predictive spatial remapping is only part of the story. Here I review key findings, recent debates, and open questions regarding remapping and its implications for visual attention and perception. This review focuses on two key questions: when does remapping occur, and what is the impact on feature perception? Findings are reviewed within the framework of a two-stage, or dual- spotlight, remapping process, where spatial attention must be both updated to the new location (fast, predictive stage) and withdrawn from the previous retinotopic location (slow, post-saccadic stage), with a particular focus on the link between spatial and feature information across eye movements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.