Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31075511›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2019

Detection of Tumor NTRK Gene Fusions to Identify Patients Who May Benefit from Tyrosine Kinase (TRK) Inhibitor Therapy.

Susan J Hsiao, Ahmet Zehir, Anthony N Sireci, Dara L Aisner

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 101 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
101citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
24.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

101 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 220 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. JCO precision oncology · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Latent profile analysis for assessing symptom clusters in women with breast cancer.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Frontiers in medicine · 2026
    Article
  15. Evaluation ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Susan J HsiaoDepartment of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.
Ahmet ZehirDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Anthony N SireciDepartment of Medical Affairs, Loxo Oncology, Inc., Stamford, Connecticut.
Dara L AisnerDepartment of Pathology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado. Electronic address: dara.aisner@ucdenver.edu.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · USLoxo Oncology at Lilly (United States) · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromosomal rearrangements involving the NTRK1, NTRK2, and NTRK3 genes (NTRK genes), which encode the high-affinity nerve growth factor receptor (TRKA), brain-derived neurotrophic factor/neurotrophin-3 (BDNF/NT-3) growth factor receptor (TRKB), and neurotrophin-3 (NT-3) growth factor receptor (TRKC) tyrosine kinases (TRK proteins), act as oncogenic drivers in a broad range of pediatric and adult tumor types. NTRK gene fusions have been shown to be actionable genomic events that are predictive of response to TRK kinase inhibitors, making their routine detection an evolving clinical priority. In certain exceedingly rare tumor types, NTRK gene fusions may be seen in the overwhelming majority of cases, whereas in a range of common cancers, reported incidences are in the range of 0.1% to 2%. Herein, we review the structure of the three NTRK genes and the nature and incidence of NTRK gene fusions in different solid tumor types, and we summarize the clinical data showing the importance of identifying tumors harboring such genomic events. We also outline the laboratory techniques that can be used to diagnose NTRK gene fusions in clinical samples. Finally, we propose a diagnostic algorithm for solid tumors to facilitate the identification of patients with TRK fusion cancer. This algorithm accounts for the widely varying frequencies by tumor histology and the underlying prevalence of TRK expression in the absence of NTRK gene fusions and is based on a combination of fluorescence in situ hybridization, next-generation sequencing, and immunohistochemistry assays.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorGenetic TestingAlgorithmsClinical Decision-MakingComputational BiologyGene FrequencyGenomicsHumansMultigene FamilyNeoplasmsOncogene Proteins, FusionPrognosisProtein Kinase InhibitorsReceptors, Nerve Growth FactorTreatment OutcomeBiomarkers, TumorOncogene Proteins, FusionProtein Kinase InhibitorsReceptors, Nerve Growth Factor

Identifiers

PMID31075511
PMCPMC7456740
OpenAlexW2944515601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.