Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31075258›Full record

ArticleExperimental cell research2019

Role of forward and reverse signaling in Eph receptor and ephrin mediated cell segregation.

Zhonglin Wu, Tim G Ashlin, Qiling Xu, David G Wilkinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental cell research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Segmentation and patterning of the vertebrate hindbrain.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhonglin WuThe Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK.
Tim G AshlinThe Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK.
Qiling XuThe Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK.
David G WilkinsonThe Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK. Electronic address: david.wilkinson@crick.ac.uk.

Funding

Medical Research Council FC001217Wellcome Trust FC001217
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eph receptor and ephrin signaling has a major role in segregating distinct cell populations to form sharp borders. Expression of interacting Ephs and ephrins typically occurs in complementary regions, such that polarised activation of both components occurs at the interface. Forward signaling through Eph receptors can drive cell segregation, but it is unclear whether reverse signaling through ephrins can also contribute. We have tested the role of reverse signaling, and of polarised versus non-polarised activation, in assays in which contact repulsion drives cell segregation and border sharpening. We find that polarised forward signaling drives stronger segregation than polarised reverse signaling. Nevertheless, reverse signaling contributes since bidirectional Eph and ephrin activation drives stronger segregation than unidirectional forward signaling alone. In contrast, non-polarised Eph activation drives little segregation. We propose that although polarised forward signaling is the principal driver of segregation, reverse signaling enables bidirectional repulsion which prevents mingling of each population into the other.

Indexed as

Signal TransductionCell MovementCell PolarityEphrinsGene Knockdown TechniquesHEK293 CellsHumansReceptors, Eph FamilyEphrinsReceptors, Eph FamilyBorder sharpeningCell segregationCell signalingContact repulsionEph receptorEphrin

Identifiers

PMID31075258
PMCPMC6546932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.