Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31075150›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Can a standards-based approach improve access to and quality of primary health care? Findings from an end-of-project evaluation in Ghana.

Christina Maly, Richard Okyere Boadu, Carina Rosado, Aliza Lailari, Bernard Vikpeh-Lartey, Chantelle Allen

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Christina MalyMonitoring, Evaluation and Research, Jhpiego, Johns Hopkins University Affiliate, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2486-5995
Richard Okyere BoaduDepartment of Health Information Management, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.
Carina RosadoStrategy & Analytics, Deloitte Consulting, LLP, Rossylyn, VA, United States of America.
Aliza LailariStrategic Information and Evaluation, Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Bernard Vikpeh-LarteyIndependent Development Consultant, Takoradi, Ghana.
Chantelle AllenTechnical Leadership and Innovations, Jhpiego, Johns Hopkins University Affiliate, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Johns Hopkins University · USDeloitte (United States) · USElizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation · USTakoradi Technical University · GHUniversity of Cape Coast · GH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundJhpiego implemented a 5-year project to strengthen the Community-Based Health Planning and Services (CHPS) model in six coastal districts of Ghana's Western Region. The project utilized a quality improvement approach (Standards-Based Management and Recognition [SBM-R]) to strengthen implementation fidelity of the CHPS model. This article presents findings from an end-of-project evaluation comparing quality, access to care, and experience of care in intervention and comparison CHPS zones.

methodsA non-equivalent, posttest-only, end-of-project evaluation compared 12 randomly selected intervention zones with 12 matched comparison zones. Data from standards-based assessments measured provision of care in three categories: community engagement, clinical services, and facility readiness and management. Access to and experience of care were assessed using a household survey of 426 randomly selected community members from the selected CHPS zones. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to compare performance on these measures between intervention and comparison CHPS zones.

resultsOverall, intervention zones outperformed comparison zones on achievement of standards (83.6% vs 58.8%) across all three assessment categories, with strongest results in community engagement (85.7% vs. 41.4%). Respondents in intervention zones were more than twice as likely to have received a home visit from a community health officer, three times as likely to have a home visit from a community health volunteer, and more likely to have attended a health talk (41.9% vs. 27.0%). Client experiences of care were reported as positive in both study arms.

conclusionsThe evaluation demonstrated improved access to quality care; however, there were very few differences in client experience of care between intervention and comparison zones. As Ghana and other countries are committed to scaling up universal health care, a pragmatic approach such as SBM-R could prove useful to engage both facility- and community-based service providers, as well as community members, to improve provision of care.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCommunity Health ServicesDelivery of Health CareFemaleGhanaHealth PlanningHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareQuality ImprovementRandom AllocationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31075150
PMCPMC6510430
OpenAlexW2944556797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.