Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31074989›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2019

Structure and Dynamics of Water at the Water-Air Interface Using First-Principles Molecular Dynamics Simulations. II. NonLocal vs Empirical van der Waals Corrections.

Mayank Dodia, Tatsuhiko Ohto, Sho Imoto, Yuki Nagata

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mayank DodiaMax Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10 , 55128 Mainz , Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8533-885X
Tatsuhiko OhtoGraduate School of Engineering Science , Osaka University , 1-3 Machikaneyama , Toyonaka, Osaka 560-8531 , Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8681-3800
Sho ImotoMax Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10 , 55128 Mainz , Germany.
Yuki NagataMax Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10 , 55128 Mainz , Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9727-6641

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

van der Waals (vdW) correction schemes have been recognized to be essential for an accurate description of liquid water in first-principles molecular dynamics simulation. The description of the structure and dynamics of water is governed by the type of the vdW corrections. So far, two vdW correction schemes have been often used: empirical vdW corrections and nonlocal vdW corrections. In this paper, we assess the influence of the empirical vs nonlocal vdW correction schemes on the structure and dynamics of water at the water-air interface. Since the structure of water at the water-air interface is established by a delicate balance of hydrogen bond formation and breaking, the simulation at the water-air interface provides a unique platform to testify as to the heterogeneous interaction of water. We used the metrics [ Ohto et al. J. Chem. Theory Comput. , 2019 , 15 , 595 - 602 ] which are directly connected with the sum-frequency generation spectroscopic measurement. We find that the overall performance of nonlocal vdW methods is either similar or worse compared to the empirical vdW methods. We also investigated the performance of the optB88-DRSLL functional, which showed slightly less accuracy than the revPBE-D3 method. We conclude that the revPBE-D3 method shows the best performance for describing the interfacial water.

Identifiers

PMID31074989
PMCPMC6750744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.