Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31074919›Full record

SynthesisThe Australian journal of rural health2019

Continuity of care for patients with chronic conditions from rural or remote Australia: A systematic review.

Tamara D Street, Klaire Somoray, Georgia C Richards, Sarah J Lacey

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Australian journal of rural health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Access and models of obstructive sleep apnea care: a cross-national comparison of Canadian and Australian patient survey data.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Treatment outcomes among rural and urban patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a prospective cohort study.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tamara D StreetWesley Medical Research, The Wesley Hospital, Auchenflower, Queensland, Australia.
Klaire SomorayWesley Medical Research, The Wesley Hospital, Auchenflower, Queensland, Australia.
Georgia C RichardsWesley Medical Research, The Wesley Hospital, Auchenflower, Queensland, Australia.
Sarah J LaceyWesley Medical Research, The Wesley Hospital, Auchenflower, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify the barriers and facilitators of achieving continuity of care between health services for patients with chronic conditions living in regional, rural and remote Australia.

designA systematic literature review of peer-reviewed journal publications between January 1990 and April 2018.

settingPublications were sourced from medical and scientific databases, including: PubMed; Embase; OvidSP; ProQuest research library; and ScienceDirect.

participantsStudies, involving two groups, were included in the review: (a) Australian adults, residing in non-metropolitan areas with a chronic condition, who accessed health care services; and (b) health care service providers (eg, doctors) who provided care to non-metropolitan patients.

main outcome measuresFacilitators and barriers of continuity of care for non-metropolitan patients with a chronic condition.

resultsInitially, 536 studies were included in the review. Of these, 12 studies were found to have met the eligibility criteria and were included in the final analysis.

conclusionsCoordination of health care services for non-metropolitan patients with chronic conditions substantially improves the outcomes for patients. Overall, communication, availability of resources and location are the major barriers and facilitators to continuity of care, depending on how they are managed. Recommendations have been provided to assist practitioners and policy-makers to improve the experience of shared care and health outcomes for non-metropolitan patients.

Indexed as

Chronic DiseaseContinuity of Patient CareRural Health ServicesRural PopulationFemaleHumansMaleNew Zealandbarrierscoordination of carefacilitatorsquality of careregional

Identifiers

PMID31074919
PMCPMC7328768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.