Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31074879›Full record

ArticleHematological oncology2019

Plasma soluble programmed death ligand 1 levels predict clinical response in peripheral T-cell lymphomas.

Xuhan Zhang, Lu Liu, Shiyong Zhou, Kuo Zhao, Zheng Song, Ge Hu, Tingting Zhang, Yang Li, Lihua Qiu, Lanfang Li and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hematological oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Xuhan ZhangDepartment of Lymphoma, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, the Sino-US Center for Lymphoma and Leukemia Research, Tianjin, China.
Lu LiuDepartment of Lymphoma, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, the Sino-US Center for Lymphoma and Leukemia Research, Tianjin, China.
Shiyong ZhouDepartment of Lymphoma, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, the Sino-US Center for Lymphoma and Leukemia Research, Tianjin, China.
Kuo ZhaoDepartment of Lymphoma, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, the Sino-US Center for Lymphoma and Leukemia Research, Tianjin, China.
Zheng SongDepartment of Lymphoma, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, the Sino-US Center for Lymphoma and Leukemia Research, Tianjin, China.
Ge HuDepartment of Lymphoma, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, the Sino-US Center for Lymphoma and Leukemia Research, Tianjin, China.
Tingting ZhangDepartment of Lymphoma, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, the Sino-US Center for Lymphoma and Leukemia Research, Tianjin, China.
Yang LiDepartment of Lymphoma, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, the Sino-US Center for Lymphoma and Leukemia Research, Tianjin, China.
Lihua QiuDepartment of Lymphoma, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, the Sino-US Center for Lymphoma and Leukemia Research, Tianjin, China.
Lanfang LiDepartment of Lymphoma, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, the Sino-US Center for Lymphoma and Leukemia Research, Tianjin, China.
Zhengzi QianDepartment of Lymphoma, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, the Sino-US Center for Lymphoma and Leukemia Research, Tianjin, China.
Bin MengDepartment of Pathology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, the Sino-US Center for Lymphoma and Leukemia Research, Tianjin, China.
Yi PanDepartment of Pathology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, the Sino-US Center for Lymphoma and Leukemia Research, Tianjin, China.
Xiubao RenDepartment of Immunology/Biotherapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, the Sino-US Center for Lymphoma and Leukemia Research, Tianjin, China.
Xianhuo WangDepartment of Lymphoma, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, the Sino-US Center for Lymphoma and Leukemia Research, Tianjin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7663-2923
Huilai ZhangDepartment of Lymphoma, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, the Sino-US Center for Lymphoma and Leukemia Research, Tianjin, China.
Kai FuDepartment of Lymphoma, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, the Sino-US Center for Lymphoma and Leukemia Research, Tianjin, China.
Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital · CN

Funding

Key Research Projects of Tianjin Municipal Health Bureau 15KG145Key Research Projects of Tianjin Municipal Health Bureau 2015KZ081National Human Genetic Resources Sharing Service Platform 2005DKA21300National Key New Drug Creation Special Programs 2017ZX09304-021, 2018ZX09201015National Natural Science Foundation of China 81770213Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital Foundation 1504
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune checkpoints, including PD-1/PD-L1, play an important role in immunosuppression in various malignancies. Elevated levels of soluble programmed death ligand 1 (sPD-L1) are associated with worse prognosis in multiple myeloma and diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Herein, the purpose of this study is to investigate the relationships between plasma sPD-L1 levels and clinical response in peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) patients. A total of 37 PTCL patients and 20 healthy volunteers were enrolled. Peripheral blood from patients was collected prior to systemic therapy. Plasma levels of sPD-L1 and IFN-γ were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). PD-L1 expression in tissues was detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Clinical response for patients was evaluated. ONCOMINE database analyses showed that PD-L1 mRNA expression was significantly upregulated in PTCLs. The median sPD-L1 level was 0.729 ng/mL for 20 healthy volunteers and 1.696 ng/mL for 37 PTCL patients which was significantly higher than that in healthy volunteers (0.000). The sPD-L1 level was positively correlated with IFN-γ level (0.000, r = 0.849) and was also positively associated with clinical staging (0.045), LDH level (0.003), and β2-MG level (0.045). Patients with high sPD-L1 level had lower overall response rate than those with low sPD-L1 level (88.9% vs 50.0%, 0.022) and tended to have poorer PFS and OS. PD-L1 expression in tissues matched very well with the sPD-L1 level in PTCL patients. In conclusion, PTCL patients had higher sPD-L1 level compared with healthy volunteers. High sPD-L1 level was correlated with worse clinical response, suggesting that sPD-L1 level was an underlying plasma biomarker to predict the prognosis for PTCL patients.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansImmunohistochemistryImmunosuppression TherapyImmunosuppressive AgentsInterferon-gammaLymphoma, T-Cell, PeripheralMaleMiddle AgedB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorCD274 protein, humanIFNG protein, humanImmunosuppressive AgentsInterferon-gammaclinical responseIFN-γPTCLssPD-L1

Identifiers

PMID31074879
PMCPMC6771895
OpenAlexW2944142475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.