ArticleAnalytical chemistry2019
High-Precision Quantitation of Biofluid Samples Using Direct Mass Spectrometry Analysis.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in MXene-Based Electrochemical Sensors for Multiplexed Detection in Biofluids.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Article
- High-Throughput Liquid-Liquid Extractions with Nanoliter Volumes.Analytical chemistry · 2020Article
- Facile Improvement of Negative Ion Mode Electrospray Ionization Using Capillary Vibrating Sharp-Edge Spray Ionization.Analytical chemistry · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The transition of mass spectrometry for clinical analysis is highly desirable, and major progress has been made with direct sampling ionization for operation simplification. High-precision quantitation, however, remains a major challenge in this transition. Herein, a novel method was developed for direct quantitation of biofluid samples, using an extremely simplified procedure for incorporation of internal standards selected against the traditional rules. Slug flow microextraction was used for the development, with conditions predicted by a theoretical model, viz., using internal standards of partition coefficients very different from the analytes and large sample-to-extraction solvent volume ratios. Direct quantitation of drug compounds in urine and blood samples was demonstrated. This development enabled an extremely simplified protocol that is expected to have a significant impact on on-site or clinical analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.