Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31074379›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2019

Computed tomography angiography-based analysis of high-risk intracerebral haemorrhage patients by employing a mathematical model.

Le Zhang, Jin Li, Kaikai Yin, Zhouyang Jiang, Tingting Li, Rong Hu, Zheng Yu, Hua Feng, Yujie Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. An integrated platform forFrontiers in genetics · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Exploring the computational methods for protein-ligand binding site prediction.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Le ZhangCollege of Computer and Information Science, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, People's Republic of China. zhangle06@scu.edu.cn.
Jin LiCollege of Computer and Information Science, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, People's Republic of China.
Kaikai YinCollege of Computer and Information Science, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, People's Republic of China.
Zhouyang JiangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, People's Republic of China.
Tingting LiSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, People's Republic of China.
Rong HuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, People's Republic of China.
Zheng YuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fuling Central Hospital, Chongqing, 400715, People's Republic of China.
Hua FengDepartment of Neurosurgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, People's Republic of China.
Yujie ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, People's Republic of China. yujiechen6886@foxmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHaemorrhagic stroke accounts for approximately 31.52% of all stroke cases, and the most common origin is hypertension. However, little is known about the method to identify high-risk populations of hypertensive intracerebral haemorrhage.

resultsThe results showed that the angle between the middle cerebral artery and the internal carotid artery (AMIC), the distance between the beginning of the median artery and superior trunk (DMS), and the density (CT value) of the lenticulostriate artery (CTL) were statistically significant enough to cause intracerebral haemorrhage. In addition, we chose these three potential features for the ensemble learning classification model. Our developed ensemble-learning method outperforms not only previous work but also three other classic classification methods based on accuracy measurements.

conclusionsThe developed mathematical model in the present study is efficient in predicting the probability of intracerebral haemorrhage.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalCerebral HemorrhageComputed Tomography AngiographyHumansHypertensionPredictive Value of TestsRisk FactorsComputed tomography angiographyEnsemble learningIntracerebral haemorrhageLenticulostriate arterial, data mining

Identifiers

PMID31074379
PMCPMC6509873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.