Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31074246›Full record

Observational studyJournal of gynecologic oncology2019

Prognostic importance of atypical endometriosis with architectural hyperplasia versus cytologic atypia in endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer.

Isabel Ñiguez Sevilla, Francisco Machado Linde, Maria Del Pilar Marín Sánchez, Julián Jesús Arense, Amparo Torroba, Anibal Nieto Díaz, Maria Luisa Sánchez Ferrer

Open access · diamondAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Systematic Review of Atypical Endometriosis-Associated Biomarkers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Immune pathway through endometriosis to ovarian cancer.World journal of clinical oncology · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Isabel Ñiguez Sevilla *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'Virgen de la Arrixaca' University Clinical Hospital, Murcia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7264-6802
Francisco Machado Linde *Department of Gynecology, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Murcia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9852-8089
Maria Del Pilar Marín SánchezDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'Virgen de la Arrixaca' University Clinical Hospital, Murcia, Spain. Ibsyna@hotmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3349-8445
Julián Jesús ArensePreventive Medicine and Public Health, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Murcia School of Medicine, Murcia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9801-1060
Amparo TorrobaDepartment of Pathology, 'Virgen de la Arrixaca' University Clinical Hospital, Murcia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0110-6475
Anibal Nieto DíazDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'Virgen de la Arrixaca' University Clinical Hospital, Murcia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0792-7119
Maria Luisa Sánchez FerrerDepartment of Gynecology, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Murcia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9173-5229
Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca · ESHospital Reina Sofía de Murcia · ESUniversidad de Murcia · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePatients with endometriosis are at increased risk of ovarian cancer. It has been suggested that atypical endometriosis is a precursor lesion of endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer (EAOC). The aim of this study is to evaluate if cytologic (cellular) atypia and architectural atypia (hyperplasia), histologic findings described as atypical endometriosis, play a different role in patients with EAOC.

methodsA prospective study was conducted between January 2014 and April 2017 at our institution with patients undergoing surgery with a histologic diagnosis of endometriosis, ovarian cancer, or EAOC. The prevalence and immunohistologic study (Ki-67, BAF250a, COX-2) of cases of cellular and architectural atypia in endometriosis were analyzed.

resultsTwo hundred and sixty-six patients were included: the diagnosis was endometriosis alone in 159 cases, ovarian cancer in 81, and EAOC in 26. Atypical endometriosis was reported in 23 cases (12.43%), 39.13% of them found in patients with EAOC. Endometriosis with cellular atypia was found mainly in patients without neoplasm (71.4%), and endometriosis with architectural atypia was seen in patients with ovarian cancer (88.9%) (p=0.009). Ki-67 was significantly higher in endometriosis patients with architectural atypia than those with cellular atypia.

conclusionThe diagnosis of endometriosis with architectural atypia is important because it may be a precursor lesion of ovarian cancer; therefore, pathologists finding endometriosis should carefully examine the surgical specimen to identify any patients with hyperplasia-type endometriosis, as they may be at higher risk of developing EAOC.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorDNA-Binding ProteinsEndometrial HyperplasiaEndometriosisFemaleHumansKi-67 AntigenOvarian NeoplasmsPrecancerous ConditionsProspective StudiesTranscription FactorsARID1A protein, humanBiomarkers, TumorDNA-Binding ProteinsKi-67 AntigenTranscription FactorsEndometriosisHyperplasiaOvarian Cancer

Identifiers

PMID31074246
PMCPMC6543102
OpenAlexW2922233609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.