Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31074240›Full record

ArticleJournal of gynecologic oncology2019

Efficacy and fertility outcomes of levonorgestrel-releasing intra-uterine system treatment for patients with atypical complex hyperplasia or endometrial cancer: a retrospective study.

Umberto Leone Roberti Maggiore, Fabio Martinelli, Giulia Dondi, Giorgio Bogani, Valentina Chiappa, Maria Teresa Evangelista, Viola Liberale, Antonino Ditto, Simone Ferrero, Francesco Raspagliesi

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP Guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2021
    Guideline
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Umberto Leone Roberti MaggioreDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy. ulrm@me.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3744-2668
Fabio MartinelliDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4863-1747
Giulia DondiDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8393-1799
Giorgio BoganiDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8373-8569
Valentina ChiappaDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1811-209X
Maria Teresa EvangelistaDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6488-4058
Viola LiberaleDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9056-8235
Antonino DittoDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5684-8225
Simone FerreroAcademic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2225-5568
Francesco RaspagliesiDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4740-7794
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITOspedale Policlinico San Martino · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the efficacy of levonorgestrel-releasing intra-uterine system (LNG-IUS) treatment in patients affected by atypical complex hyperplasia/endometrial cancer (ACH/EC) wishing to preserve their fertility and to present fertility outcomes of those patients who actively tried to conceive.

methodsData of consecutive women with ACH/EC who underwent fertility-sparing treatment using LNG-IUS were retrospectively evaluated.

resultsOverall, 48 patients and the mean (±standard deviation) length of follow-up was 82.6±47.2 months. Among patients with ACH, 25/28 (89.3%) had a complete response (CR), 2/28 (7.1%) had a partial response (PR) and 1/28 (3.6%) had a progressive disease (PD). Mean (±standard deviation) time to CR was 6.7±4.0 months. Among patients with G1 EC, 13/16 (81.3%) had a CR, 1/16 (6.3%) had a PR and 2/16 (12.5%) had a PD. Mean (±standard deviation) time to CR was 5.0±2.9 months. Among patients with G2 EC, 3/4 (75.0%) had a CR and 1/4 (25.0%) had a PD. Mean (±standard deviation) time to CR was 4.0±0 months. Only 19 (39.6%) patients who had CR actually attempted to conceive. Eleven (57.9%) women tried to conceive naturally while 8 (42.1%) women underwent an in vitro fertilization (IVF). Fourteen (73.7%) patients wishing to conceive achieved a pregnancy (6 spontaneously and 8 through IVF).

conclusionsFertility-sparing treatment of patient with ACH/EC with LNG-IUS achieves high regression rates and good fertility outcomes. Future larger multi-institutional studies should be designed to confirm these preliminary findings.

Indexed as

Intrauterine Devices, MedicatedAdultCarcinoma, EndometrioidEndometrial HyperplasiaEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleFertility PreservationFollow-Up StudiesHumansLevonorgestrelNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPregnancyRetrospective StudiesLevonorgestrelEndometrial CancerFertilityHyperplasiaLevonorgestrelPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID31074240
PMCPMC6543108
OpenAlexW2919351068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.