ArticleJournal of gynecologic oncology2019
Stage and histology of cervical cancer in women under 25 years old.
Article in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- A nomogram for predicting prognosis for young cervical neuroendocrine carcinoma: A SEER-based study and external validation.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Development of a prognostic model for cervical cancer based on inflammation-related gene signatures and immune microenvironment regulation.American journal of cancer research · 2025Article
- Social determinants influencing cervical cancer diagnosis: an ecological study.International journal for equity in health · 2023Article
- HPV prevalence and genotype distribution in 2,306 patients with cervical squamous cell carcinoma in central and eastern China.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Clinicopathological Features and Survival of Adolescent and Young Adults with Cervical Cancer.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the histological and stage characteristics of cervical cancer in women under 25 years old, and to compare them with older women.
methodsCross-sectional study of cases from the Hospital Cancer Registry of São Paulo State/Brazil from 2000 to 2015. Variables were age, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage and histological type. Prevalence ratio (PR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated.
resultsOut of 18,423 cervical cancer cases 204 (1.1%) were in women under 25 years old. The most frequent stage was stage I in women under 25 (36.2%) and between 25 and 34 (43.4%), and stage III in older women (31.8%). No statistically significant difference was observed in stages by age group. Squamous carcinomas were the most frequent in 73.5% of women under 25 and 78.5% of older women. In women under 25 the following histological types were more frequent: neuroendocrine carcinomas (PR=6.10, 95% CI=2.03-18.35), malignant germ cell tumors (PR=54.98, 95% CI=26.53-113.95), mesenchymal tumors (sarcomas) (PR=5.67, 95% CI=2.58-12.45) and hematopoietic/lymphoid tumors (PR=0.72, 95% CI=2.90-36.69).
conclusionIn women under 25 years old cervical cancer was an uncommon diagnosis and in about one third occurred at early stage. Squamous carcinoma was the most frequent histological type regardless age, but rare histological types were more frequent in young women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.