ArticleMolecular and cellular biochemistry2019
Distinct biological characterization of the CD44 and CD90 phenotypes of cancer stem cells in gastric cancer cell lines.
Article in Molecular and cellular biochemistry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrated Transcriptomic Analysis and Machine Learning Identify THY1 as a Key Regulator of Cancer-Associated Fibroblast Infiltration, Promoting Malignant Progression and Immune Escape in Gastric Cancer.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Article
- Neoadjuvant sintilimab, albumin-bound paclitaxel, and carboplatin for locally advanced, resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: clinical study and mechanistic exploration.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Nanotherapeutic strategies exploiting biological traits of cancer stem cells.Bioactive materials · 2025Review
- Innovative Immunotherapy and Its Transformative Impact on Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Comprehensive Review of the Disease's Origins, Epidemiology, Classification, Diagnosis, and Treatment Options.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2025Review
- High expression ofBiochemistry and biophysics reports · 2025Article
- Cancer stem cells in personalized therapy: mechanisms, microenvironment crosstalk, and therapeutic vulnerabilities.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- Analysis of Cancer Stem Cell Markers in Various Histological Subtypes of Adrenocortical Cancer.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024Article
- Review
- Systems biology approach to identify biomarkers and therapeutic targets for colorectal cancer.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2024Article
- Investigating the mechanism and the effect of aquaporin 5 (AQP5) on the self-renewal capacity of gastric cancer stem cells.Journal of Cancer · 2024Article
- Strategies for the Isolation and Identification of Gastric Cancer Stem Cells.Stem cells international · 2024Review
- Article
- Potent suppression of neuroendocrine tumors and gastrointestinal cancers by CDH17CAR T cells without toxicity to normal tissues.Nature cancer · 2022Article
- Review
- The origin of gastric cancer stem cells and their effects on gastric cancer: Novel therapeutic targets for gastric cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Review
- CD44 as a tumor biomarker and therapeutic target.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2020Review
- High-dimensional single-cell proteomics analysis reveals the landscape of immune cells and stem-like cells in renal tumors.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2020Article
- Review
- A Complex and Evolutive Character: Two Face Aspects of ECM in Tumor Progression.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Recent study implicates that gastric cancer stem cells (CSCs) are capable of generating multiple types of cells to promote tumor growth and heterogeneity important for the development of gastric cancer. However, knowledge is limited regarding the expression and characteristics of marker-positive gastric CSCs. Therefore, gastric CSCs from a series of human gastric cancer cell lines (SNU-5, SNU-16, BGC-823, PAMC-82, MKN-45, and NCI-N87) using four putative CSC surface markers (CD44, CD90, CD133, and epithelial-cell adhesion molecule) were investigated the underlying mechanisms regulating such subpopulations. Only SNU-5 and SNU-16 exhibited independent co-expression of CD44
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.