Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31073867›Full record

ArticleMagma (New York, N.Y.)2019

In-bore biopsies of the prostate assisted by a remote-controlled manipulator at 1.5 T.

Nicolas Linder, Alexander Schaudinn, Tim-Ole Petersen, Nikolaos Bailis, Patrick Stumpp, Lars-Christian Horn, Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg, Thomas Kahn, Michael Moche, Harald Busse

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nicolas LinderDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Leipzig University Hospital, Liebigstrasse 20, Haus 4, 04103, Leipzig, Germany. Nicolas.Linder@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.
Alexander SchaudinnDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Leipzig University Hospital, Liebigstrasse 20, Haus 4, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Tim-Ole PetersenDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Leipzig University Hospital, Liebigstrasse 20, Haus 4, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Nikolaos BailisDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Leipzig University Hospital, Liebigstrasse 20, Haus 4, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Patrick StumppDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Leipzig University Hospital, Liebigstrasse 20, Haus 4, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Lars-Christian HornInstitute of Pathology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Jens-Uwe StolzenburgDepartment of Urology, Leipzig University Hospital, Leipzig, Germany.
Thomas KahnDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Leipzig University Hospital, Liebigstrasse 20, Haus 4, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Michael MocheDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Leipzig University Hospital, Liebigstrasse 20, Haus 4, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Harald BusseDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Leipzig University Hospital, Liebigstrasse 20, Haus 4, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the technical and clinical utility of a fully MRI-compatible, pneumatically driven remote-controlled manipulator (RCM) for targeted biopsies of the prostate at 1.5 T. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe data of the first 22 patients that were biopsied under robotic assistance were analyzed. Interventional planning relied on T2-weighted (T2w) turbo spin-echo (TSE) images (axial and sagittal) with a high-b-value diffusion-weighted acquisition added in selected cases. Alignment of the needle guide was controlled with a short balanced SSFP sequence in two oblique planes along the MR-visible sheath. Signals were acquired with a combination of elements from a 30-channel body and a 32-channel spine coil. Biopsy samples were taken with a fully automatic 18-G biopsy gun with a length of 150 or 175 mm.

resultsMean age was 66.6 years and average PSA level was 11.5 ng/ml. Fourteen out of 22 patients (63%) had received prior biopsies under transrectal ultrasound guidance. Diagnostic MRI reports (before biopsy) involved 17 cases with a single suspicious finding (four PI-RADS 3, one PI-RADS 3-4, eight PI-RADS 4 and nine PI-RADS 5 cases). The median effective procedure time was 33.9 (range 25.0-55.9) min for 16 cases with one CSR and 63.4 (52.7-81.8) min for 5 cases with two CSRs. The biopsy with three CSRs took 74.0 min. Histopathologic examination revealed prostate cancer in 14 of 22 cases.

conclusionMR-targeted, transrectal biopsy of the prostate could be reliably performed with a robotic manipulator at a field strength of 1.5 T. Balanced SSFP imaging is considered a viable option for fast procedural control. Follow-up work needs to evaluate to what extent in-bore adjustments and workflow enhancements will contribute to shorter procedure times or higher patient comfort.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance Imaging, InterventionalAgedBiopsyDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedMotionPattern Recognition, AutomatedProstateProstatic NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesRoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresBiopsyMagnetic resonance imagingNeedleProstatic neoplasmsRobotics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.