ArticleJournal of digital imaging2019
Assessment of Critical Feeding Tube Malpositions on Radiographs Using Deep Learning.
Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of Chest Radiograph Captions Based on Natural Language Processing vs Completed by Radiologists.JAMA network open · 2023Trial
- Review of Artificial Intelligence for Automated Assessment of Lines, Drains, and Airways on Pediatric and Adult Chest Radiographs.Pediatric reports · 2026Review
- Pilot Evaluation of a Deep Learning Model for Nasogastric Tube Verification on Chest Radiographs: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2025Article
- Deep learning based dual stage model for accurate nasogastric tube positioning in chest radiographs.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Assessing the Links Between Artificial Intelligence and Precision Nutrition.Current nutrition reports · 2025Review
- Deep Learning-Based Localization and Detection of Malpositioned Nasogastric Tubes on Portable Supine Chest X-Rays in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine: A Multi-center Retrospective Study.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Deep Convolutional Backbone Comparison for Automated PET Image Quality Assessment.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2024Article
- Inconsistency between Human Observation and Deep Learning Models: Assessing Validity of Postmortem Computed Tomography Diagnosis of Drowning.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence in the detection of non-biological materials.Emergency radiology · 2024Review
- Detection and position evaluation of chest percutaneous drainage catheter on chest radiographs using deep learning.PloS one · 2024Article
- Agreement Between Epigastric Auscultation and pH Measurement in the Confirmation of Nasoenteral Tube Placement.Florence Nightingale journal of nursing · 2023Article
- Analysis of Line and Tube Detection Performance of a Chest X-ray Deep Learning Model to Evaluate Hidden Stratification.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Reducing the number of unnecessary biopsies for mammographic BI-RADS 4 lesions through a deep transfer learning method.BMC medical imaging · 2023Article
- An Artificial Neural Network for Nasogastric Tube Position Decision Support.Radiology. Artificial intelligence · 2023Article
- Machine Learning Augmented Interpretation of Chest X-rays: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Transfer learning for medical image classification: a literature review.BMC medical imaging · 2022Review
- Article
- Development of CNN models for the enteral feeding tube positioning assessment on a small scale data set.BMC medical imaging · 2022Article
- Using Transfer Learning Method to Develop an Artificial Intelligence Assisted Triaging for Endotracheal Tube Position on Chest X-ray.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Automatic Detection and Classification of Multiple Catheters in Neonatal Radiographs with Deep Learning.Journal of digital imaging · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Assess the efficacy of deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) in detection of critical enteric feeding tube malpositions on radiographs. 5475 de-identified HIPAA compliant frontal view chest and abdominal radiographs were obtained, consisting of 174 x-rays of bronchial insertions and 5301 non-critical radiographs, including normal course, normal chest, and normal abdominal x-rays. The ground-truth classification for enteric feeding tube placement was performed by two board-certified radiologists. Untrained and pretrained deep convolutional neural network models for Inception V3, ResNet50, and DenseNet 121 were each employed. The radiographs were fed into each deep convolutional neural network, which included untrained and pretrained models. The Tensorflow framework was used for Inception V3, ResNet50, and DenseNet. Images were split into training (4745), validation (630), and test (100). Both real-time and preprocessing image augmentation strategies were performed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and area under the curve (AUC) on the test data were used to assess the models. Statistical differences among the AUCs were obtained. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The pretrained Inception V3, which had an AUC of 0.87 (95 CI; 0.80-0.94), performed statistically significantly better (p < .001) than the untrained Inception V3, with an AUC of 0.60 (95 CI; 0.52-0.68). The pretrained Inception V3 also had the highest AUC overall, as compared with ResNet50 and DenseNet121, with AUC values ranging from 0.82 to 0.85. Each pretrained network outperformed its untrained counterpart. (p < 0.05). Deep learning demonstrates promise in differentiating critical vs. non-critical placement with an AUC of 0.87. Pretrained networks outperformed untrained ones in all cases. DCNNs may allow for more rapid identification and communication of critical feeding tube malpositions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.