Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31073813›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2019

Thrombotic events induce the worse prognosis in ovarian carcinomas and frequently develop in ovarian clear cell carcinoma.

Kazuki Takasaki, Morikazu Miyamoto, Masashi Takano, Hiroaki Soyama, Tadashi Aoyama, Hiroko Matsuura, Hideki Iwahashi, Hiroki Ishibashi, Takahiro Sakamoto, Kenichi Furuya

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Venous thromboembolism incidence in cancer patients with germline BRCA mutations.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2022
    Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kazuki TakasakiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Defense Medical College Hospital, Tokorozawa, 359-8513, Saitama, Japan.
Morikazu MiyamotoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Defense Medical College Hospital, Tokorozawa, 359-8513, Saitama, Japan. mmiyamoto@ndmc.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4763-0926
Masashi TakanoDepartment of Clinical Oncology, National Defense Medical College Hospital, Tokorozawa, 359-8513, Saitama, Japan.
Hiroaki SoyamaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Defense Medical College Hospital, Tokorozawa, 359-8513, Saitama, Japan.
Tadashi AoyamaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Defense Medical College Hospital, Tokorozawa, 359-8513, Saitama, Japan.
Hiroko MatsuuraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Defense Medical College Hospital, Tokorozawa, 359-8513, Saitama, Japan.
Hideki IwahashiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Defense Medical College Hospital, Tokorozawa, 359-8513, Saitama, Japan.
Hiroki IshibashiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Defense Medical College Hospital, Tokorozawa, 359-8513, Saitama, Japan.
Takahiro SakamotoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Defense Medical College Hospital, Tokorozawa, 359-8513, Saitama, Japan.
Kenichi FuruyaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Defense Medical College Hospital, Tokorozawa, 359-8513, Saitama, Japan.
National Defense Medical College Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to examine the clinical significance and risk factors of thromboembolic events (TEEs) in patients with ovarian carcinoma.

methodsPatients with ovarian carcinoma treated at our hospital between 2000 and 2017 were identified. The risk factors of TEEs, including venous TEEs and arterial TEEs, and the association between TEEs and prognosis were investigated. Patients with TEEs were classified into two groups: those with severe TEEs, defined as patients who required urgent treatment for deep vein thrombosis, massive pulmonary embolism, acute myocardial infarction, and symptomatic cerebral infarction, and those with mild TEEs. The risk factors of severe TEEs and the association between severe TEEs and prognosis were investigated.

resultsA total of 369 patients were enrolled. Among them, 53 patients (14.4%) were complicated with TEEs. Clear cell carcinoma (CCC) was a greater risk factor of TEEs than serous carcinoma (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.81, p = 0.03). In multivariate analysis for survival, TEEs were a prognostic factor of poor progression-free survival (PFS; HR = 2.90, p < 0.01) and overall survival (OS; HR = 2.89, p < 0.01). Among 53 patients with TEEs, 17 (32.1%) developed severe TEEs. CCC was strongly associated with severe TEEs (HR = 42.6, p = 0.02). Multivariate analysis for survival demonstrated that severe TEEs were a risk factor of worse PFS (HR = 4.34, p < 0.01) and OS (HR = 3.30, p = 0.03).

conclusionTEEs induced poor prognosis and was associated with CCC. A standard treatment for CCC should be included in the strategy of TEEs.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma, Clear CellCystadenocarcinoma, SerousCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansMiddle AgedOvarian NeoplasmsPrognosisPulmonary EmbolismRisk FactorsSurvival RateVenous ThrombosisArterial thromboembolismClear cell carcinomaOvarian cancerThromboembolic eventsVenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID31073813
OpenAlexW2944194915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.