Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31073769›Full record

SynthesisSurgical endoscopy2020

Clinical efficacy of per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for spastic esophageal disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Saurabh Chandan, Babu Pappu Mohan, Ojasvini Choudhry Chandan, Lokesh Kumar Jha, Harmeet Singh Mashiana, Alexander Todd Hewlett, Mouen A Khashab

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Surgical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Spastic Esophageal Disorders-How Much Muscle Should We Cut?Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Esophageal POEM: the new standard of care.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia.Journal of thoracic disease · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Saurabh ChandanDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 982000 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198, USA. s.chandan@unmc.edu.
Babu Pappu MohanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Banner University Medical Center, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Ojasvini Choudhry ChandanDepartment of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Lokesh Kumar JhaDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 982000 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198, USA.
Harmeet Singh MashianaDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 982000 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198, USA.
Alexander Todd HewlettDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 982000 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198, USA.
Mouen A KhashabDivision of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.
University of Nebraska Medical Center · USBanner - University Medical Center Tucson · USJohns Hopkins Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPOEM has been successfully performed in patients with spastic esophageal disorders (SED), such as diffuse esophageal spasm, jackhammer esophagus, and type 3 achalasia. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate its efficacy in these patients and if total average myotomy length and prior medical or endoscopic treatments affected clinical success.

methodsPubMed, EMBASE, Google-Scholar, Scopus, and Cochrane Review were searched for studies on POEM in SED from 2008 to September 2018. Clinical success was determined by Eckardt score (≤ 3) at follow-up. Sub-group analysis was performed based on myotomy length and evaluates the effect of prior treatments on clinical success.

results9 studies with 210 patients were included in the final analysis. We found that the pooled rate of clinical success for POEM was 89.6% (95% CI 83.5-93.1, 95% PI 83.4-93.7, I

conclusionsWhile it is well known that POEM is a safe and effective treatment for spastic esophageal disorders, we conclude that variation in total myotomy length and prior endoscopic or medical treatments did not have a significant effect on clinical success.

Indexed as

EsophagoscopyMyotomyNatural Orifice Endoscopic SurgeryEsophageal AchalasiaEsophageal Motility DisordersEsophageal Spasm, DiffuseHumansTreatment OutcomeAchalasiaDiffuse esophageal spasmEsophageal motilityNutcracker esophagus

Identifiers

PMID31073769
OpenAlexW2944202959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.