SynthesisSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2019
Efficacy, tolerability and safety of cannabis-based medicines for cancer pain : A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Synthesis in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.
- Balancing risks and benefits of cannabis use: umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials and observational studies.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2023Pooled it
- Cannabis-based medicines and medical cannabis for adults with cancer pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- MASCC guideline: cannabis for cancer-related pain and risk of harms and adverse events.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023Guideline
- Medicinal cannabis for symptom control in advanced cancer: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised clinical trial of 1:1 tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Trial
- Review
- Natural Products Derived from Cannabis sativa for Pain Management.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2025Review
- The Role of Cannabinoids in Advancing Cancer Treatment: Insights from Evidence-Based Medicine.Current oncology reports · 2024Review
- Clinical Benefits and Safety of Medical Cannabis Products: A Narrative Review on Natural Extracts.Pain and therapy · 2024Review
- Management of pain in cancer patients - an update.Ecancermedicalscience · 2024Article
- Medical Cannabis Increases Appetite but Not Body Weight in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.Nutrients · 2023Article
- Article
- Marijuana use among US adults with cancer: findings from the 2018-2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2023Article
- Mediators of Placebo Response to Cannabinoid Treatment in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Impacts of medical and non-medical cannabis on the health of older adults: Findings from a scoping review of the literature.PloS one · 2023Article
- Should oncologists trust cannabinoids?Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Review
- Clinical Research Evidence Supporting Administration and Dosing Recommendations of Medicinal Cannabis as Analgesic in Cancer Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Practical Considerations for the Use of Cannabis in Cancer Pain Management-What a Medical Oncologist Should Know.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Article
- Routes of administration, reasons for use, and approved indications of medical cannabis in oncology: a scoping review.BMC cancer · 2022Article
- Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of a Medicinal Cannabis Formulation in Patients with Chronic Non-cancer Pain on Long-Term High Dose Opioid Analgesia: A Pilot Study.Pain and therapy · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe importance of medical cannabis and cannabis-based medicines for cancer pain management needs to be determined.
methodsA systematic literature search until December 2018 included CENTRAL, PubMed, SCOPUS and trial registers. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating medical cannabis and/or pharmaceutical cannabinoids for pain control in cancer patients with a study duration of at least 2 weeks and a sample size of at least 20 participants per study arm were included. Clinical outcomes comprised efficacy (pain intensity, patient impression of improvement, combined responder, sleep problems, psychological distress, opioid maintenance and breakthrough dosage), tolerability (dropout rate due to adverse events) and safety (nervous system, psychiatric and gastrointestinal side effects; serious adverse events). The quality of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).
resultsFive RCTs with oromucosal nabiximols or tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) including 1534 participants with moderate and severe pain despite opioid therapy were identified. Double blind period of the RCTs ranged between 2 and 5 weeks. Four studies with a parallel design and 1333 patients were available for meta-analysis. The quality of evidence was very low for all comparisons. Oromucosal nabiximols and THC did not differ from placebo in reducing pain, sleep problems, opioid dosages and in the frequency of combined responder, serious adverse events and psychiatric disorders side effects. The number of patients who reported to be much or very much improved was higher with oromucosal nabiximols and THC than with placebo (number needed to treat for an additional benefit 16; 95% confidence interval [CI] 8 to infinite). The dropout rates due to adverse events (number needed to treat for an additional harm [NNTH]: 20; 95% CI 11-100), the frequency of nervous system (NNTH: 10; 95% CI 7-25) and of gastrointestinal side effects (NNTH: 11; 95% CI 7-33) was higher with oromucosal nabiximols and THC than with placebo.
conclusionsVery low quality evidence suggests that oromucosal nabiximols and THC have no effect on pain, sleep problems and opioid consumption in patients with cancer pain with insufficient pain relief from opioids. The complete manuscript is written in English.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.