Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31073678›Full record

ArticleDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2019

[Application of rebound self-tonometry for measurements in a supine position].

Afsaneh Amani, André Rosentreter, Thomas Dietlein, Robert Hoerster

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 95% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Comparative analysis of anterior chamber stability with a cohesive ophthalmic viscosurgical device versus the soft-shell technique.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Afsaneh AmaniMVZ ADTC Mönchengladbach/Erkelenz GmbH, Ostpromenade 41, 41812, Erkelenz, Deutschland.
André RosentreterAugenklinik, Helios Universitätsklinikum Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Deutschland.
Thomas DietleinZentrum für Augenheilkunde, Universität zu Köln, Köln, Deutschland.
Robert HoersterMVZ ADTC Mönchengladbach/Erkelenz GmbH, Ostpromenade 41, 41812, Erkelenz, Deutschland. r.hoerster@augencentrumerkelenz.de.
Hermann-Josef-Krankenhaus Erkelenz · DEHelios Universitätsklinikum Wuppertal · DEUniversity of Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiurnal or nocturnal fluctuations of intraocular pressure (IOP), which are especially common in glaucoma patients, often require hospitalization of the patient in order to be detected. This is often inconvenient for the patient. Therefore, this study evaluated the usefulness of a rebound tonometer (RT) designed for IOP self-tonometry (RT-Home) in an outpatient department, especially in the supine position and out of office hours.

methodsOver a period of 6 months unselected open-angle glaucoma patients were equipped with a RT-home device for one night each. At the beginning IOP values measured by medical personnel (RT-Home(o)) were compared with IOP measured by the patient (RT-Home(p)), as well as measured by applanation tonometry according to Goldmann (GAT). Patients also completed a questionnaire regarding subjective comfort during use of the RT-Home.

resultsThe RT-Home(o) showed a bias of -1.1 mm Hg (-7.9 to 5.7 mm Hg) compared to GAT and RT-Home(p) showed a bias of -1.6 mm Hg (-8.9 to 5.9 mm Hg) compared to GAT. The measurement differences between GAT and RT-Home(o) as well as RT-Home(p) showed a stong correlation with the IOP and the central corneal thickness (IOP: r = 0.481, P > 0.0001, RT-Home(o) vs. GAT; corneal thickness: r = 0.612, P < 0.0001, RT-Home(o) vs. GAT). The RT-Home(p) in a supine position showed significantly elevated IOP levels than during the day (P < 0.0001). The RT-Home showed no qualitative differences between measurements in supine and sitting positions. DISCUSSION: The RT-Home is effective and precise for use in an outpatient department to gain a general overview over patients' IOP out of office hours and also in the supine position. In the long term it seems possible that RT-Home can avoid hospitalization for diurnal and nocturnal IOP evaluation especially of young, mobile patients; however, interpretation of the data always requires professional knowledge.

Indexed as

Intraocular PressureSupine PositionTonometry, OcularCorneaHumansManometryReproducibility of ResultsGlaucomaRebound tonometrySelf-tonometrySupine positionTonometry

Identifiers

PMID31073678
OpenAlexW2943911236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.