ReviewJournal of pediatric intensive care2019
Sepsis and Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.
Review in Journal of pediatric intensive care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinically Suspected Invasive Meningococcal Disease Presenting With Purpura Fulminans-Like Rash, Septic Shock, Multiorgan Dysfunction, and Recovery From ARDS in a Previously Healthy Child.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Clinical profile, intensive care needs, outcome, and predictors of mortality in children with severe sepsis: Secondary analysis of FerriPedS study.The Indian journal of medical research · 2026Article
- Fenofibrate Mitigates Acute Lung Injury in a Rat Model of Feces-Induced Peritonitis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Localized surface plasmon resonance-based point-of-care testing for pediatric sepsis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
- Burden and outcomes of pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome among children with sepsis: a cohort study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Derivation and Validation of a Clinical and Endothelial Biomarker Risk Model to Predict Persistent Pediatric Sepsis-Associated Acute Respiratory Dysfunction.CHEST critical care · 2025Article
- Advances and Challenges in Pediatric Sepsis Diagnosis: Integrating Early Warning Scores and Biomarkers for Improved Prognosis.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Heparin-Binding Protein Promotes Acute Lung Injury in Sepsis Mice by Blocking the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Signaling Pathway.Journal of inflammation research · 2024Article
- Risk Factors and Clinical Characteristics of Neonatal Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Caused by Early Onset Sepsis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
- Sepsis-related pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome: A multicenter prospective cohort study.Turkish journal of emergency medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The epidemiology of the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in pediatric sepsis is poorly defined. With significant data extrapolated from adult studies in sepsis and ARDS, sometimes with uncertain applicability, better pediatric-specific guidelines and dedicated investigations are warranted. The recent publication of a consensus definition for pediatric ARDS (PARDS) is the first step in addressing this knowledge gap. The aim of this review is to frame our current understanding of PARDS as it relates to pediatric sepsis, encompassing epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management. We argue that addressing the role of PARDS in pediatric sepsis requires significant attention to details with respect to how PARDS and sepsis are defined to accurately describe their epidemiology, natural history, and outcomes. Finally, we highlight certain aspects of PARDS management as they relate to the septic child and offer suggestion for future directions in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.