ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2019
Modeling Conformationally Flexible Proteins With X-ray Scattering and Molecular Simulations.
Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biochemical and Structural Analyses of the Tardigrade DNA-Damage Suppressor Protein, Dsup.Journal of molecular biology · 2025Article
- Review
- Structural insights into the disulfide isomerase and chaperone activity of TrbB of the F plasmid type IV secretion system.Current research in structural biology · 2024Article
- Orientationally Averaged Version of the Rotne-Prager-Yamakawa Tensor Provides a Fast but Still Accurate Treatment of Hydrodynamic Interactions in Brownian Dynamics Simulations of Biological Macromolecules.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2023Article
- Recent Advances in Understanding the Structures of Translesion Synthesis DNA Polymerases.Genes · 2022Review
- Review
- Conformational flexibility of fork-remodeling helicase Rad5 shown by full-ensemble hybrid methods.PloS one · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Proteins and protein complexes with high conformational flexibility participate in a wide range of biological processes. These processes include genome maintenance, gene expression, signal transduction, cell cycle regulation, and many others. Gaining a structural understanding of conformationally flexible proteins and protein complexes is arguably the greatest problem facing structural biologists today. Over the last decade, some progress has been made toward understanding the conformational flexibility of such systems using hybrid approaches. One particularly fruitful strategy has been the combination of small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) and molecular simulations. In this article, we provide a brief overview of SAXS and molecular simulations and then discuss two general approaches for combining SAXS data and molecular simulations: minimal ensemble approaches and full ensemble approaches. In minimal ensemble approaches, one selects a minimal ensemble of structures from the simulations that best fit the SAXS data. In full ensemble approaches, one validates a full ensemble of structures from the simulations using SAXS data. We argue that full ensemble models are more realistic than minimal ensemble searches models and that full ensemble approaches should be used wherever possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.