Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31073290›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2019

Verbal Encouragement and Between-Day Reliability During High-Intensity Functional Strength and Endurance Performance Testing.

Florian A Engel, Oliver Faude, Sarah Kölling, Michael Kellmann, Lars Donath

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Using the Countermovement Jump Metrics to Assess Dynamic Eccentric Strength: A Preliminary Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Effect of the Verbal Encouragement on Psychophysiological and Affective Responses during Small-Sided Games.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Florian A EngelDepartment of Movement and Training Science, Institute of Sport and Sport Science, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Oliver FaudeDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Sarah KöllingUnit of Sport Psychology, Faculty of Sports Science, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Michael KellmannUnit of Sport Psychology, Faculty of Sports Science, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Lars DonathDepartment of Intervention Research in Exercise Training, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As verbal encouragement (VE) is used in high intensity functional exercise testing, this randomized controlled crossover study aimed at investigating whether VE affects high intensity functional strength and endurance performance testing. We further examined between-day variability of high intensity functional strength and endurance performance testing with and without VE. Nineteen experienced athletes (seven females and 12 males, age: 23.7 ± 4.3 years) performed a standardized one repetition maximum (1 RM) squat test and a 12-min high-intensity functional training (HIFT) workout [as many repetitions as possible (AMRAP)] on four different days over a 2-week period. Athletes randomly performed each test twice, either with VE or without (CON), with a minimum of 72 h rest between tests. Very good to excellent relative between-day reliability with slightly better values for strength testing (ICC: 0.99; CV: 3.5-4.1%) compared to endurance testing (ICC 0.87-0.95; CV: 3.9-7.3%) were observed. Interestingly, VE led to higher reliability during endurance testing. Mean squat strength depicted higher strength values with VE (107 ± 33 kg) compared to CON (105 ± 33 kg;

Indexed as

crossoverfunctional traininghigh intensity power trainingperformanceRCTverbal encouragement

Identifiers

PMID31073290
PMCPMC6497006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.