Trial reportScientific reports2019
Symptom trajectories in patients with panic disorder in a primary care intervention: Results from a randomized controlled trial (PARADISE).
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of a transdiagnostic mental health intervention in German primary care: a parallel-group, two-arm, cluster randomised controlled pilot study.BMC primary care · 2026Trial
- Non-pharmacological treatment of anxiety in general practice: a scoping review.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2026Article
- Evaluation of a transdiagnostic mental health intervention in German primary care: study protocol for a parallel-group, two-arm, cluster randomised controlled pilot study.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2025Article
- Psychometric evaluation and Rasch analyses of the German Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS-D).Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This analysis aims to identify and characterize symptom trajectories in primary care patients with panic disorder with/without agoraphobia (PD/AG) who participated in a primary care team based training involving elements of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT). Growth Mixture Modeling was used to identify different latent classes of change in patients with PD/AG (N = 176) who underwent treatment including CBT elements. We identified three patient classes with distinct similar trajectories. Class 1 (n = 58, mean age: 46.2 years ± 13.4 years, 81% women) consisted of patients with an initially high symptom burden, but symptoms declined constantly over the intervention period. Symptoms of patients in class 2 (n = 89, mean age: 44.2 years ± 14.5 years, 67.4% women) declined rapidly at the beginning, then patients went into a plateau-phase. The third class (n = 29, mean age: 47.0 years ± 12.4 years, 65.5% women) was characterized by an unstable course and had the worse outcome. Our findings show that only a minority did not respond to the treatment. To identify this minority and refer to a specialist would help patients to get intensive care in time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.